moktonar

7 ms·

61.
by moktonar 1y ago
That is evil, no, I was thinking more about selective knowledge exploration to see if a candidate is fit for the position.
62.
by moktonar 1y ago
Wouldn’t this method be good if applied on humans in job interviews?
63.
by moktonar 1y ago
What you call “going to shit” I call “garbage collection”. It’s something you can’t avoid in any environment with finite resources
64.
by moktonar 1y ago
You solve it by staying skeptic! :)
65.
by moktonar 1y ago
Sure, but if the result is convincing enough, it might linger for a long time before someone finds a corner case where it doesn’t hold. For these reasons I think it would be better to have a different approach.
66.
by moktonar 1y ago
I find that cases like this represent one of the biggest problems in today’s research: once someone falsifies something, an entire branch of research gets cut off completely as nobody wants to pursue that path anymore, understandably. But i
67.
by moktonar 1y ago
Let's say I want to reprogram my car's ECU what resources would you point me at
68.
by moktonar 1y ago
Do they exist for any other car? Genuinely interested
69.
by moktonar 1y ago
Yes but it’s essentially just because they are Russian, which again, is curious
70.
by moktonar 1y ago
Curious, because just recently he expelled Russian maintainers from the Linux project, just because
71.
by moktonar 1y ago
Can you hear that Mr.Anderson? That is the sound of inevitability..
72.
by moktonar 1y ago
The simulation rolls back to match the constraints, easy
73.
by moktonar 1y ago
Time to make our own internet…
74.
by moktonar 1y ago
Do this in time and not only in space, using energy-momentum as the metric and you get Gravity and General Relativity. They are so close and yet they don’t seem to see it.
75.
by moktonar 1y ago
In the end it’s all about bytes and the meaning you assign them. Edit: and algorithms
76.
by moktonar 1y ago
Yeah, and we represent the evolutionary force, but that means that the ability to craft silicon life depends on our ability to find an efficient algorithm to do so...
77.
by moktonar 1y ago
Intelligence is not only embodied (it needs a body), it is also embedded in the environment (it needs the environment). If you want an intelligence in your computer, you need an environment in your computer first, as the substrate from whic
78.
by moktonar 1y ago
Unfortunately the correct simulation hypothesis not only can explain how, but also why. There are many wrong formulations of the sim hypothesis, but when done right it can explain almost everything. For example, Constructor Theory is in fa
79.
by moktonar 1y ago
While impressive, a lot of manual human work was involved both to filter the input and the output, this is not a “fully” automated workflow, sorry. But, yeah, kudos to them.
80.
by moktonar 1y ago
Technically this is linked to the ability to simulate our universe efficiently. If it’s simulable efficiently then AGI is possible for sure, otherwise we don’t know. Everything boils down to the existence or not of an efficient algorithm to
81.
by moktonar 1y ago
We live in a simulation and the random values are produced outside of it. "God" doesn't play dice, he knows the seed, while on the other hand we don't, and for us that noise is "truly random".That's why we
82.
by moktonar 1y ago
The web is currently just “controlled code execution” on your device. This will never work if not done properly. We need a real “web 3.0” where web apps can run natively and containerized, but done correctly, where they are properly sandbox
83.
by moktonar 1y ago
Good luck
84.
by moktonar 1y ago
Then make the govt pension plan opt in and make the citizens choose whether or not to have the money invested (maybe give a discount to those that do). Be transparent and track the total you already payed and what your pension will be at re
85.
by moktonar 1y ago
Only future will tell right?
86.
by moktonar 1y ago
Non-mandatory, private savings is a far better idea. Ah wait but now the govt doesn't have the money anymore... ops. Maybe _that's_ why they struggle, because they don't find a way of taking your money without telling you...
87.
by moktonar 1y ago
If pensions where not mandatory you would be almost right. But pensions are mandatory, the state will invest the money upfront and earn from those investments. It's just a way of making you pay more, and then give you back less. Anothe
88.
by moktonar 1y ago
Shouldn't expenses be proportional to population size? If not so, then spend less? Birth rate below replacement doesn't mean population size is not enough to pay for expenses, it just means it will slowly decrease, which btw is go
89.
by moktonar 1y ago
> Important The Qiskit Textbook has been superseded by IBM Quantum Learning. These source files are no longer maintained and may contain errors. We are not accepting any contributions. https://learning.quantum-computing.ibm.co
90.
Ask HN: Books to learn quantum computer programming
1 points by moktonar 1y ago|4 comments

More ›