Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mojomark
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
511.
▲
Containershipping: Restoring Balance
(marinelink.com)
1 points
by
mojomark
8y ago
|
0 comments
512.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Me too, and that's a good point. Judging from comnents above, I don't think viewers today (who weren't used to life before the internet and mobile) don't really grasp the level of foresight required at the time to be so
513.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
So, now, if someone gets murdered in the city square (public domain), are city officials charged with murder?
514.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Good answer, thank you. Like I said, it all boils down to the cost of H2 production for a given process. If you have a path to get to $1/kg H2, that is truly awesome! Working very peripherally in this sector, I applaud your efforts, no
515.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
> It won't and it can't. Rather it can at the cost of ~20 trillion dollars (23GWh [1] at 900 million [0] for GWh for the Tesla battery). Sorry, this statement is incomplete and as a result, leads to an incorrect conclusion. Tes
516.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Thanks for the response! So, my point is that in the bio-gas process, you are generation H2 + CO2 and using some proceeds from H2 sales to sequester the CO2 you produce. However, with electrolysis (from renewable elect. plants), you aren&#x
517.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
You probably know, but don't forget that compressing air is energy intensive. I'm not saying that the extra expense can't be marginalized - especially if you can dramatically increase production, I'm just pointing out th
518.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
In case anyone is curious as to how bio-gassification compares to electrolysis (or a hybrid process), I found this 2009 paper [1] that sums it up decently (at least with the technology available at the time): (Note: SEK := Swedish Krone; cu
519.
▲
Show HN: FLIR in Airships to Prevent Elephant Poaching
(youtube.com)
3 points
by
mojomark
8y ago
|
0 comments
520.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
> I suspect you are correct here. We were shoving "recycling" in otherwise empty shipping containers and sending them to China... This actually makes sense. The container trade imbalance leaves the U.S. with a large excess of c
521.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
That's interesting; thanks for the link. If they used foveal rendering and custom optics to tackle the problem, I could see this ultra-high resolution being feasible with current LCD/LED display resolutions. I will attempt to chec
522.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
For me, we are concerned with designing our plants to ensure humans can interact efficiently & safely with the systems (power plants) we're designing. Here are some benefits for me of VR over 2D viewing of 3D models: 1. Visibility
523.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
The focus seems to be on games, but VR has huge potential in the workforce (engineering, medical, perhaps even office work - data mining/etc.). However, utility software companies like Autodesk products have very shoddy and fickle VR s
524.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
> I don't. I believe in AR but not short-term. I think AR will go into a "winter" soon and will be picked up by the mainstream some years later after key technology challenges are solved. I think AR (glasses) is at where V
525.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
In your statement, based on your understanding, do you think either of the following wording substitutions are accurate? Instead of: > how insanely chaotic a cell is Perhaps: "how insanely high a cell's spatial and temporal ent
526.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Couldn't this be solved (or the risk of manipulation largely mitigated) using a trusted third party to witness, and perhaps hold, each candidates pre-image generation?
527.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
...and regarding environmental controls instigating a recession, that is very far from the truth (again, in my experience). Extending the above 'ship design industry' example, when IMO imposed emission caps on ships, did the shipp
528.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
> It's not as simple as laziness. > Within our current economic system, any country that will try to _really_ do something will face severe recession. I respectfully disagree. From my experience, it's quite simply a matter o
529.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
It's 2019 and as an engineer responsible for designing large power plants with the potential to emit large amounts of Carbon over the next 50 years, I'm doing everything in my f*cking power every day to eliminate harmful emissions
530.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Holy crap - that's totally what happened. Fascinating... "[Killer whale nicknamed] Old Tom's role was commonly to alert the human whalers to the presence of a baleen whale in the bay by breaching or tailslapping at the mouth
531.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
That's interesting; something I never really paid attention too when I was working with an mobile device AR app company. Is this research somehow tied into the relationship between UI and imaging AR head mounted displays or are you foc
532.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
The author discusses square degrees, but then makes the following statement: "if we stack 19 Hololens 2 units perfectly, we have ourselves a fully Holographic sphere)...So don’t get hyped on that!" ...and it's rediculous asse
533.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
The article discusses the history of the concept, but completely misses Disney's fair treatment of the topic in Flight of the Navigator(1) CA. 1986;) 1. https://youtu.be/gVebPEYiq2o
534.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
47 pixels per degree (PPD) would certainly be good enough to emulate a desktop monitor. In reality, 35 PPD is sufficient, albeit only capable of emulating low end monitors. 62 PPD is roughly the limit of human eye resolution for a general s
535.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
> I'm not speaking of the sensor, but rather the meat computer interpreting it. I don't know what rock I've been living under, but that's the first time I've heard the brain referred to as a 'meat computer&#
536.
▲
Near-Eye Wavefront Emulating Display
(lens.org)
33 points
by
mojomark
8y ago
|
7 comments
537.
▲
Research Search
(academic.microsoft.com)
2 points
by
mojomark
8y ago
|
0 comments
538.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
And nobody said "boo" about the thousands, if not millions, of Microsoft office installations on NMCI and other DoD computers. What, you think the Integrated Master Schedule for that latest Vertical Launch System wasn't organ
539.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
>>(fusion360/onshape), but those are still quite limited and of course do not satisfy free software user like me. Fusion360 is free (1). I used it for a while; though I didn't get into all of the features so I didn't re
540.
▲
by
mojomark
8y ago
Wow, that is useful information! Ne'er again will I buy a text without reading the fine print. Lesson learned.
More ›