moi2388

46 ms·

961.
by moi2388 2y ago
I’ve just always considered natural keys public keys, and added a surrogate key as private key. From the outside you won’t see it, but internally it saves a lot of headaches. Space, speed, migrations, I have just never seen an actual downsi
962.
by moi2388 2y ago
In principle a proof of the Riemann Hypothesis could give you information about the distribution of primes and could possible make it easier to test for primality, in the worst case breaking modern encryption. But that’s a lot of what ifs a
963.
by moi2388 2y ago
Linux and office. Other than that, what does it really offer?
964.
by moi2388 2y ago
People in stores don’t calculate. People who buy software do. Like actual calculations: $10 / month / user * 100 users In a store people often don’t even look at the price, just”I see cheese. Oeh, LESS than $3?” Completely differe
965.
by moi2388 2y ago
Why wouldn’t the older ones do that, and only the males?
966.
by moi2388 2y ago
He did not need to show it was safe, only that it did not interfere with the study
967.
by moi2388 2y ago
Unexpectedly, the area of tattooed body surface turned out not to matter. I’m calling bullshit.
968.
by moi2388 2y ago
Thanks! That makes it incredibly obvious
969.
by moi2388 2y ago
That’s not because it’s some deep philosophical problem, but because people refuse to define what they mean by consciousness. Do they mean memory? Attention? Awareness? Self awareness? The inner voice? Qualia? All of these can be explained
970.
by moi2388 2y ago
They definitely should. Plenty of movies are based on other movies or hommages to it, and typecasting exists as long as cinema. I remain with my point that if they did any processing that made the voice sound more like Scarlett they most
971.
by moi2388 2y ago
Which has exceptions. So not a law, but a heuristic.
972.
by moi2388 2y ago
Indeed. Not to mention this: After preprocessing, 49 individuals were excluded from final analyses for the following criteria. First, they either failed pre-defined survey attention checks or did not complete every survey. Further, particip
973.
by moi2388 2y ago
We all just move in circles
974.
by moi2388 2y ago
He said that less than 10% of smokers HAVE lung issues, not “eventually get” lung issues. Big, big difference.
975.
by moi2388 2y ago
Not if half of them are 80 >.> Seriously not every trait is revelations beneficial nor had to be
976.
by moi2388 2y ago
Any reason biologists name these “rules” or “laws” rather than “heuristics”?
977.
by moi2388 2y ago
Not a mathematician. Afaik category theory is more like an alternative to set theory. Langlands is more like a bridge between higher level mathematics, allowing you to transform hard problems in geometry to harmonic analysis and vice versa,
978.
by moi2388 2y ago
Right.. but they already do. Teams ui is not the same as web ui is not the same as desktop ui is not the same as mobile ui. All I’m suggesting is splitting it on use case rather than on which device I open it
979.
by moi2388 2y ago
If you search Google scholar you’d find well over 20,000 studies. That’s more than “a bunch”, and I’d love to see how you know all of them are flawed.
980.
by moi2388 2y ago
Even if they did. How does that matter? Let’s say I want to shoot a movie. Id love to have Scarlett star in it. But I can’t afford her, so I hire some b actress that kind of looks like her. What’s wrong with that? The only way I could see t
981.
by moi2388 2y ago
What a great article. Really helped clear things up /s
982.
by moi2388 2y ago
His talks are some of the most fascinating I’ve ever heard. Nick Lane is a close second.
983.
by moi2388 2y ago
Don’t worry, the milk from infected cows is still being sold but the US government said its completely safe :D
984.
by moi2388 2y ago
Yes, how dare another woman have a voice that might somewhat sound like Scarlett?
985.
by moi2388 2y ago
What a complete asshole. Btw, isn’t architecture under copyright as well, specifically when it is the sole object of a photograph by a professional? Pretty sure it is. Counter sue the sh*t out of that scumbag.
986.
by moi2388 2y ago
How many studies show no adverse effects, or even a single positive one? Is it zero? ;)
987.
by moi2388 2y ago
That makes sense. It doesn’t make sense why you wouldn’t simply correct for that, or why having 2 sensors wouldn’t fix it?
988.
by moi2388 2y ago
Right. You do realise all your finances are in your bank and that’s all online right? Same with most health information. Or your child’s beach pictures. I do not think I should be allowed to access or use any of that without your consent
989.
by moi2388 2y ago
Of course you can. When the brits first met the Chinese, the Chinese didn’t speak a word of English and the British not a word of Chinese. The Chinese room thought experiment is flawed; this is exactly how we learn languages!
990.
by moi2388 2y ago
I make art but I don’t sell it. Don’t get me wrong, if a painter makes a painting that painting is his and he can sell it, I can’t steal it. But I can’t also paint that? Not download a copy of it? Not take a picture? How do you own the idea

More ›