modsec

4 ms·

1.
by modsec 8y ago
This is an interesting story. Python breaks perfectly reasonable code which is surprisingly nothing new for Python. A tool stops working. Users want fix. Author of the tool is unavailable. The tool needs to be forked. A new name needs to be
2.
by modsec 8y ago
Like what? SpamAssassin? You would be surprised how much obvious spam gets through it in the face of the kind of spam onslaught that goes on in the real world today. Seriously, this problem is not as easy to solve for machines as you think
3.
by modsec 8y ago
I see comments like this coming up on Hacker News almost every month and I tend to think that people who make these comments are either too young and/or have not worked for a mid-sized to a large company. If you have worked in any comp
4.
by modsec 8y ago
> idiots at Twitter A constructive comment would have been to point us at good spam filters that are very good at not allowing obvious spam so that we do not make the same mistake that Twitter did and be labelled as "idiots" by
5.
by modsec 8y ago
What's a good alternative you would suggest? I often have a similar problem and the fact is that most users hang out on platforms that suck like Twitter, Facebook, etc. If I build my business on a decentralized platform like blockchain
6.
by modsec 8y ago
I am missing the point of the article. Why does build failing require any incentive or punishment? If a build fails, nothing changes in the production environment. The developer can troubleshoot and fix the build. Pretty much like when loca