Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mo3gut
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
Sounds like a "Yes". Thanks for the reply, dahdum.
2.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
Mr Stamos is unhappy with Russia, mentioned repeatedly. Their "activity" needs to be "dealt with". AIPAC, "America's Pro-Israel Lobby", isn't worth a mention. Israel apparently does nothing that nee
3.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
Quite right. In fact, those statisticians in the posted article are surely mistaken. We know that using tricks to hide things is sound science. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/11/the-
4.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
If the "spies" really did "steal" (i.e. copy) an engine design then it seems like a good thing for the world in general. They have helped spread useful knowledge. Sure, it's bad for the would-be rent-seekers whose
5.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
It's amusing that this is hosted by a spyware vendor.
6.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
One not on the list is Template::Toolkit. Perhaps it's considered too old-school. TT is stable, available virtually everywhere and (like perl itself) is well documented and works without fuss.
7.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
> assumptions about who is responsible for data security. The chief assumption appears to be "anyone but the browser vendors". Let us consult the article: BeEF This, to me, was the most impactful demo Quite the endors
8.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
> Your browser then sends Referer: ... While I don't doubt dataskydd's good intentions, their advice about referrers is a sign that we live in Clown World. Yes, your browser's tendency to provide a referrer might well give
9.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
Yet they have numerous defenders on this site, all the more peculiar considering those companies' collusion to avoid paying market rates to developers. The preference to be a sharecropper on their plantations is evidently strong, for
10.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
Try https://wiby.me/
11.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
> To me it felt rogue since it had been generated without me knowing nor expecting it That's understandable. Fastmail do the same, i.e. acquiring certs for their customers' domains without asking or informing, with a view to m
12.
▲
by
mo3gut
8y ago
"your data belongs to you" Not the SSL certificate for your domain, which Fastmail will acquire with or without your prior knowledge or consent, and to which you have no access or control. https://www.fastmail.com/
13.
▲
by
mo3gut
9y ago
> brilliant, ethical, and pragmatic In case it's news to others, as it was to me, Fastmail routinely acquires SSL certificates for its customers' domains without their knowledge or consent. https://www.fastmail.com&#