mnicole

62 ms·

571.
by mnicole 14y ago
But they're not all anonymous, and it doesn't matter whether or not they are. I wrote the other day here about a girl that posted about her friend finding herself on there and how humiliating the whole ordeal was. One unfortunately-placed b
572.
by mnicole 14y ago
Gawker has nothing to do with this at the core of the issue; these subreddits exist with or without them. They've been a burden to users who see them as the embarrassing drunk uncle and the reason why Reddit isn't taken more seriously. Your
573.
by mnicole 14y ago
Not at all what I'm saying, but one of them went into a profession where publicity was the name of the game and the other is just trying to buy groceries with your kids. The paparazzi has been harassing celebrities for decades; it isn't rig
574.
by mnicole 14y ago
One is Lindsay Lohan and one is your wife.
575.
by mnicole 14y ago
Thank you. Really wishing there were more women actively commenting in these threads as they're the ones actually affected by these types of behaviors. It's easy to say "Things are fine, leave it alone" when you're not the ones being target
576.
by mnicole 14y ago
> People hurting themselves over trolling is an education issue. You can tell someone plenty of times that they shouldn't take something to heart, but it takes a lot more than "education" to give them confidence and self-worth. On edit,
577.
by mnicole 14y ago
Can't reply to my child comment, but that makes it all the worse.
578.
by mnicole 14y ago
> but the filthiest asshole isn't Brutsch IMO. Gotta disagree with that. What this kid was doing on a micro-level hurt and affected far more people than Gawker ousting him. Plenty of trolls have been made public before, but outside of t
579.
by mnicole 14y ago
I like the idea of being able to nitpick someone's code for credits. I also like the idea of being able to take [some of] their $ if I can prove their method is wrong within a certain amount of time of being accepted, or possibly all of the
580.
by mnicole 14y ago
It shouldn't be limited to minors. They had a field day with that old Gawker editor vs. Jimmy Kimmel video yesterday because she said people should understand that if they step outside of their house, they're subjecting themselves to ridicu
581.
by mnicole 14y ago
A link to the rules isn't going to stop things from slipping through the cracks.
582.
by mnicole 14y ago
Ditto. Time to fork and move on.
583.
by mnicole 14y ago
In trying to sign up for GroupTalent, there doesn't seem to be a middle ground between designer and developer. There's listings for designing just mockups, but in order to be considered a developer I'd need to be able to do backend programm
584.
by mnicole 14y ago
Before Googling the URL, I initially thought this was for Wander ( http://onwander.com/ ), which, while it hasn't officially launched yet, also deals with travel and has a huge following already in the design community ( http://blog.onwande
585.
by mnicole 14y ago
The only one that's remotely scalable is #135 even though you'll a) lose the runner really quick and b) he looks tired. The runner in #89 better defines "hustle", but his movement would likely ruin the flow if he was positioned on #135. Als
586.
by mnicole 14y ago
Portland, sorry.
587.
by mnicole 14y ago
This is exactly the tool I've been waiting for; great work and good luck!
588.
by mnicole 14y ago
Sorry, I meant the first comment on the story, should have specified that!
589.
by mnicole 14y ago
Try seeing if any of these make it better - http://coderwall.com/p/z7egjg?i=1&p=1&q=author%3Aman...
590.
by mnicole 14y ago
Personally, it was painful to read that first comment. The attitude that the issue is somehow minor because one hasn't dealt with it in "x amount of years" in the industry is completely moot. These scenarios depend so much on many different
591.
by mnicole 14y ago
You might think that's flattering, but I don't care what those people think about me and I definitely didn't ask them for their opinion -- whether or not it's in my favor. Do women like cat-calls from neighborhood windows and construction w
592.
by mnicole 14y ago
Guess I'm not the target audience?
593.
by mnicole 14y ago
Absolutely. Just a one or two sentence blurb or even just a relevant tagline under the logo.
594.
by mnicole 14y ago
Because it is targeting people for the sole intention of harassing them at a global level. The TwoX thread had a few stories of people finding out second-hand that they were posted on there, how demeaning it was and how powerless they felt
595.
by mnicole 14y ago
I'd rejoice, but history has proven that there's either another one lurking in obscurity or we'll see something similar crop up once the pitchforks are put back down.
596.
by mnicole 14y ago
I was ready to be on board with this just because Gawker is such a mess, but anyone that follows r/SubredditDrama knows of Violentacruz and r/creepshots just shouldn't exist. I find it surprising that Reddit moderators are going so far as t
597.
by mnicole 14y ago
https://img.skitch.com/20121011-k29i1jdb68u41g1ikhqdkemmjx.j... Chrome 21.0.1180.89, OS X (10.6.8) I've been able to replicate this in my own projects as well.
598.
by mnicole 14y ago
This reminds me of a Portland Community College professor that repeatedly stated (in a blog post on women in engineering) that he expected the females in his class to do far worse in his courses than her male peers because he believed women
599.
by mnicole 14y ago
Terrible UX. Not only does it make it nigh-impossible to hover over the other thumbnails, but transforms (scale most notably) often leave behind artifacts/borders as it does in this demo, putting white lines all over the images and their su
600.
by mnicole 14y ago
What about the fishing competitions in WoW? You could say that it's not a solid bet, but I know more than one person that kept their account activated for the sole purpose of logging in on Sunday mornings to fish and nothing more. Same with

More ›