mnewme

8 ms·

91.
by mnewme 8mo ago
They are not doing anything that is the problem. X just doesn’t care at all. But they are happy to censor for countries like turkey Hypocrisy level 1 million
92.
by mnewme 8mo ago
People defending allowing CSAM content was definitely not on my bingo card for 2026.
93.
by mnewme 8mo ago
But that is the difference, they actually do something against it.
94.
by mnewme 8mo ago
First you argue about the model, now the platform. Two different things. If a platform encourages and doesn’t moderate at all, yes we should go after the platform. Imagine a newspaper publishing content like that, and saying they are not re
95.
by mnewme 8mo ago
That is not the argument. No one is arguing about banning open source LLMs that could potentially create problematic content on huggingface, but X provides not only an AI model, but a platform and distribution as well, so that is inherently
96.
by mnewme 8mo ago
I agree that users who break the law must be prosecuted. But that doesn’t remove responsibility from tool providers when harm is predictable, scalable, and preventable by design. We already apply this logic elsewhere. Car makers must includ
97.
by mnewme 8mo ago
There is no content like that on Bluesky nor Mastadon. Show the evidence
98.
by mnewme 8mo ago
Exactly!
99.
by mnewme 8mo ago
What the hell? As a father there shouldn’t be any CSAM content anywhere. And think about that it is already proven these models apparently had CSAM content in their training data. Also what about the nudes of actual people? That is invasion
100.
by mnewme 8mo ago
They obviously didn’t really implement anything as you can find that content or involuntary nudes of other people, which is also an invasion of privacy, super easily
101.
by mnewme 8mo ago
That is not the same. Correct comparison would be: You provide a photo studio with an adjacent art gallery and allow people to shoot CSAM content there and then exhibit their work.
102.
by mnewme 8mo ago
This is the wrong take. Yes they could have an uncensored model, but then they would need proper moderation and delete this kind of content instantly or ban users that produce it. Or don’t allow it in the first place. It doesn’t matter how
103.
by mnewme 8mo ago
Good one. No platform ever should allow CSAM content. And the fact that they didn’t even care and haven’t want to spend money for implementing guardrails or moderation is deeply concerning. This has imho nothing to do with model censorship,
104.
Elon Musk's X must be banned(disconnect.blog)
18 points by mnewme 9mo ago|8 comments
105.
by mnewme 9mo ago
Trust in the US is officially broken
106.
by mnewme 10mo ago
True
107.
by mnewme 10mo ago
Not true, better line up than ted AI or Next
108.
An EU startup just beat Nvidia in AI hardware(techradar.com)
1 points by mnewme 10mo ago|0 comments
109.
by mnewme 1y ago
The problem is that we use the same words for different things, which I think is risky. We often draw parallels simply because we use terms like “thinking,” “reasoning,” or “memory.” Most of these comparisons focus on problem-solving or pat
110.
by mnewme 1y ago
Protonmail looks great! Thx
111.
by mnewme 1y ago
Thank you!
112.
Ask HN: Best Alternatives for Gmail
2 points by mnewme 1y ago|7 comments
113.
Requiem for an Exit(calls.ars.electronica.art)
27 points by mnewme 1y ago|0 comments
114.
by mnewme 1y ago
Not to that extent. Most public speakers try to convey one coherent thought they were working on before. Trump just rumbles like my granddad
115.
by mnewme 1y ago
This
116.
Open source model (fine tuning) for child-appropriate language(huggingface.co)
1 points by mnewme 1y ago|0 comments
117.
by mnewme 1y ago
Great site
118.
by mnewme 1y ago
You are right, will fix
119.
Show HN: Ugly Wallpapers(wallpapers.branding5.com)
1 points by mnewme 1y ago|2 comments
120.
by mnewme 1y ago
Pretty consistent, but the story quality is a bit bad, really boring. So many startups in that space that now get killed. Oscar Stories is going to have a hard time

More ›