mmasnick

4 ms·

1.
by mmasnick 17y ago
We have total editorial independence. They get their logos on the top on the right, and the rightto list resources in the righthand bar. We have total editorial independence on the content of the actual blog posts, and have said that repe
2.
by mmasnick 17y ago
Who said anything about ignoring your readers and the choices they make. I said the exact opposite. And, come on, don't put up strawmen. Just because you're not lobbying to change the laws doesn't change the comparison which was apt: rath
3.
by mmasnick 17y ago
No. You seem to be confused. The content of our posts and the work we do remains editorially totally independent. These aren't "hybrid" deals. These are deals where we continue to produce our content as is -- with no changes or no requi
4.
by mmasnick 17y ago
"Ad blocking isn't killing any sites. We didn't really say it was either." Did I miss something or did Ken specifically say: "Ad Blocking is devastating to the sites you love" That seems to be the same thing, no? And when you say "the resu
5.
by mmasnick 17y ago
You're right. When many people don't consider those sorts of projects ads then we're doing our job right . Good ads shouldn't be considered ads, but they should be good content. And, yes, we do have conventional ads on the site -- and I'
6.
by mmasnick 17y ago
As the guy who wrote the post linked to above, I should note that in the post itself I describe multiple examples of how to come up with creative and compelling concepts that worked great. I agree that it may be more difficult, but if you
7.
by mmasnick 17y ago
<i>All his copyright cases have either been dismissed, or else he lost.</i> This is not true. Lessig recently had a huge victory with the Golan case...