mlajtos

9 ms·

121.
by mlajtos 3y ago
You are partially right — OpenAI is way ahead of everybody else. Even though OpenAI team is thinking and doing everything for safe deployment of (baby) AGI, public and experts don’t think this should be effort lead by single company. So Goo
122.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Thank you :)
123.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> fallible and happy to be corrected Thank you, that is a very accurate description of how I operate. If you don't mind, I'll steal this phrase from you. :)
124.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> I think it would come across better if the author mixed times where their non-traditional intuition gave them the wrong answer. Oh, there are a lot of instances where I was biased and my actions were dead wrong. (example story: https:
125.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Sapir-Whorf to the rescue! :D
126.
by mlajtos 3y ago
No. As I stated, the distance is the same.
127.
by mlajtos 3y ago
You are right. Harmonic mean is the right tool.
128.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Speedometer should be enough. :)
129.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Okay, so it's not a typical tutorial. You have to golf and hack it. I'll give it a go again. Thank you for your explanation. :)
130.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I passed with `(is tiger eatable)`. I don't get it. :D
131.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I also struggle. :D I think `(eats tiger plant)` would be fine, but it isn't.
132.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Oh, I see your point now. Multiplication in Roman numerals is strikingly different (and much harder) than addition. So representation of the pattern might be so alien that it's unrecognizable even though the pattern is known.
133.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> I'm always amazed that people can get so hung up on events that happen in elementary schools. This piece feels like it could be posted to /r/iamverysmart. Ages were 10, 15 & ~23 respectively. Yes, the post suffers fr
134.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Oh shit, you are right. Added a completely explicit statement under the problem question. In both situations. Thank you for pointing this out.
135.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Once I saw 5-armed snowflake as an icon on weather forecast in TV.
136.
by mlajtos 3y ago
We are gonna need to prefix all prompts with "From now on, act without human biases."
137.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I love your comment. I tried GPT-4 via ChatGPT and it nailed it without any prompt engineering. --- Prompt: 3 hens lay 3 eggs in 3 days. How many eggs do 12 hens give in 12 days? GPT-4: Let's first determine how many eggs one hen can l
138.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I added "We have cards with a number and color on each face." to the task statement. Hope this makes rules clearer as I could not phrase it better.
139.
by mlajtos 3y ago
To be fair and square, I added an explicit statement about consistency of the cards, so it is clear.
140.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> The only condition is that an even number must have an all blue flipside. This condition is either irrelevant or satisfied for the blue card. For all other cards, we don't know. The card with "1" may have the number &quo
141.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I think it could as dealing with concrete things is a direct evolutionary advantage grounded in reality. Usually, we are shit dealing with abstract concepts. A quote that beautifully demonstrates this: "To deal with hyper-planes in 14-
142.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> unrelated to the writing (which I enjoyed) Aw, thank you. :) > related to the horizontal scrollbar Thank you very much, I was not aware of this issue. Changed both to `w-full`, hope scrollbar goes away. :) BTW As a pizza aficionado
143.
by mlajtos 3y ago
This is gold!
144.
by mlajtos 3y ago
> It's not exactly the same exactly because the difference in symbols maps to different patterns Does this mean that these should be treated differently? a) "3 * 2 = 6" b) "III + III = VI" c) "tres et tres a
145.
by mlajtos 3y ago
You described a slightly wrong Monty Hall problem [0]. When I explain solution to this problem, I always just add more doors. 1 million doors, 1 car, 999999 goats. You pick one door, and I show you 999998 goats. Only two doors are left. Wha
146.
by mlajtos 3y ago
There is a visual illustration in the article. I thought it might be useful for understating why it's 48.
147.
by mlajtos 3y ago
Yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow
148.
by mlajtos 3y ago
But the task is exactly the same in both situations – only the symbols on the cards have less/more familiar meaning. I see this as being not able to generalize from known examples.
149.
by mlajtos 3y ago
2. Firefox user, right? It should be fixed now. Thank you for reporting this issue. 1. You reminded me of another nice example of wrong shortcuts. Average speed of car from city A to city B is 120km/h. Average speed back (B -> A) wa
150.
by mlajtos 3y ago
I think it shows that we suck at generalization. Even though the task is the same, we are not able to see the same pattern in an arbitrary framing of the same problem. Beaming directly might help.

More ›