2 ms·
You are partially right — OpenAI is way ahead of everybody else. Even though OpenAI team is thinking and doing everything for safe deployment of (baby) AGI, pub
by mlajtos 3y ago
You are partially right — OpenAI is way ahead of everybody else. Even though OpenAI team is thinking and doing everything for safe deployment of (baby) AGI, public and experts don’t think this should be effort lead by single company. So Google naturaly wants to be the counterweight. (Ironic that OpenAI was supposed to be counterweight, not vice versa.) However, when you want to catch up somebody, you cheat. And cheating with AI safety is inherenťy dangerous. Moratorium for research and deployment just doesn’t make sense from any standpoint IMO.
Regarding the hand-holding: As Hinton noted, simple extrapolation of current progress yields models that are super-human in any domain. Even if these models would not be able to access Internet, in wrong hands it could create disaster. Or even in good hands that just don’t anticipate some bad outcome. Tool that is too powerful and nobody tried it before.
- jacquesm 3y ago> Even though OpenAI team is thinking and doing everything for safe deployment of (baby) AGI That claim needs more proof than is available to me at the moment.
- mlajtos 3y agoCharter – https://openai.com/charter https://openai.com/charter Usage Policies – https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies https://openai.com/policies/usage-policies Is there anything in particular that you disagree with or was it only general negative comment? What do you see as direct evidence of them not deploying (baby) AGI in a safe manner? Is this about "100x capped for profit" strategy?