Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mittensc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mittensc
4mo ago
You can use VMs for sandboxes. Linux main feature is that you are free to do anything you want. Linux does verify signatures for packages from official repos. Linux has features like SELinux and AppArmor. If you want to install a random pac
62.
▲
by
mittensc
4mo ago
single mode are pretty cheap too (12e for 10gbit/s bidi for example)
63.
▲
by
mittensc
4mo ago
why not use fiber directly and use whatever sfp for much cheaper without worry of heat
64.
▲
by
mittensc
4mo ago
UI/UX or dev isn't dead. It will be shrinking. Less grunt work. Internal projects can get done with less of either. Nobody really cares about great UX or about how great someone can implement a CRUD app. So there will be less need
65.
▲
by
mittensc
4mo ago
it is the admin responsibility to protect its citizens. has it done anything to prevent/mitigate this? or the opposite?
66.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> The attack works by having an NTFS log get replayed against another partition than the one the log is stored on. Obfuscated enough to pass internal reviews, sloppy enough to make it look like a bug. Other reply makes it even more suspi
67.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
3 would be either direct or friends/relatives with experience and I got involved to help, other 3 would be through news and incidentally knowing some people. > but one person having direct experience of all these cases is unusual fo
68.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> so far as i can tell yellowkey is problematic, as the exploit takes advantage of a backdoor that ms needs, to "manage" your computer. It does look like an intentional backdoor. The way ms is responding to it is even more susp
69.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
I've seen doctors that: 1. Immediately said 'Cancer' to stomach issues on an old person. They just didn't care, another doctor resolved that. 2. Eye doctors that would not investigate anything and just prescribe eye glas
70.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
Those low quality lawyers/doctors still won't care enough to help the layperson. So for the layperson, the AI output is still useful. They'll know to search for a different lawyer/doctor. Tool just brings more knowledge
71.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
I find your comment a bit funny > Try prompting Claude to fix an arbitrary code base better than someone who knows it, when you're a random non-technical person. I've seen people employed working on some code bases that couldn&
72.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
From the source article linked in other comments which is a nice read: > Different sections of the encyclical have very different rates of apparent AI usage. This indicates to me that some cardinals used AI assistance for this encyclical
73.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> What's the defense? Intelligent screening of incoming messages so that the threat never reaches the blackmail target? I imagine they'll find an unprotected channel. Same defenses that are used against fraud and other crime. c
74.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> Can you spend 3 months fixing a bug and doing nothing else? In what world would that be needed or accepted. It generally takes 1-2 days to fix harder issues lile race conditions/memory corruptions. Regular bugs are much faster. Al
75.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> given a short time budget (which is always the case, if we spend too much time on each bug we just fix bugs slower than they get reported and we'd enter a death spiral). This is something I don't understand. - If you have a b
76.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
> What tools have you tried? Are we talking Codex GPT 5.5 and Opus 4.7? Yes, with generous budgets. > They're also very good at fixing bugs, Seeing opposite here too, they are like eager juniors 'oh the issue is here and her
77.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
I'm seeing the exact opposite on a large C++ project. I have friends at other companies with similar projects, they say the same thing. It's like we're living in different worlds. Still, LLMs are nice for well defined small p
78.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
good, pensions should not go into companies where you have no control. That's not an investment, it's a wealth transfer to original investors at a price they dictate. without control you can get original founder deciding to build
79.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
Allright, thank you! I need to re-evaluate then.
80.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
sometimes you write the feature and write it well so it's reusable. imagine you have to implement a specific algorithm for a quantum computer. There's no value setting up AI to do the writing for you. That might be orders of magni
81.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
you tell me
82.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
what other options do you have? capitalism can work with say 99% tax on estate on death. No trust funds. Tax on wealth above a certain point. Rule of law with sharp teeth. Proper investment in education. Proper anti monopoly so all large co
83.
▲
by
mittensc
5mo ago
what do you think? now ask yourself, who are the true communists in the US?
84.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
communism means taking everything from regular people to give to the elite.
85.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
> If you assume that having the appropriate firewall rule to do that is the default That's the thing, it's not the default, default is public ipv6 for everyone and its the users duty to configure firewall... I could definitely
86.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
> Yup, repeatedly Cool, me too :) Anyway, the other side of the argument: It is the default and default is secure. Users don't have to reason about it, they can assume it works, how doesn't matter and they may lack training
87.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
Have you tried that? I have yet to see a router that allows that forwarding unless explicitly configured. Still, i'm using mostly openwrt/opnsense/mikrotik Default is to disallow/block forwarding packets from public wan
88.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
chernobyl affected a lot more then the exclusion zone, most of eastern europe... cancer rates spiked because of it... and it could have been a lot worse. Effects are long term, hence question if you would live there now?, what would happen
89.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
Would you like to live next to Chernobyl? Even with current standards there are a lot of nuclear power plants running just fine.
90.
▲
by
mittensc
6mo ago
Solution is to classify review by area, documentation is auto merged, other riskier areas still need human review. This could have been solved easily without an LLM as well...
More ›