Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mister_mister
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
1.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
for stress on the ligaments and joints weight is one the most important factors. Be it from a weighted vest, fat, or muscle. Joints of humans are not made to carry the weight of a strongman.
2.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
I would advice to lose the barbell and focus on dumbbells and machines. Try training more like bodybuilders instead of power lifters. Using the full range of motion, and being able to rotate while performing the movement will decrease the t
3.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
> "This idea of 'a calorie in and a calorie out' when it comes to weight loss is not only antiquated, it's just wrong,"[0] Would it be possible to share sources of the claims that you're making? Instead of d
4.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Low carb diet is about lowering the amount of carbs someone consumes, only some vegetables that have many carbs or starches are best to avoided, because they have more then 60% of their content in the form of carbs vs less then 10% for othe
5.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Would it be possible to at least look at the sources and argue against them? A appeal to authority, and an Ad hominem won't help the discussion along.
6.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Thank you, for at least reading the sources:) At this moment you'll be aware that are other ideas out there. To explain the link with biggest loser, the show used CICO model for the contestants to lose weight. And they did lose weight,
7.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
And the reason is only the missing of one hormone, and fat cells won't store energy. The opposite also true, there are people with too much insulin that will gain allot weight. > Despite intensive research, the causes of the obesity
8.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
> A model being difficult or tedious to quantify doesn't make it false. And, all models are wrong, but some are useful. Here is a link from Harvard saying to stop counting calories[0]. Here is another link from Havard[1] going over
9.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
> "This idea of 'a calorie in and a calorie out' when it comes to weight loss is not only antiquated, it's just wrong,"[0] Link from havard. You are under the incorrect understanding that human body is closed sys
10.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
That is problem with CICO proponents start with scientific terms. But it always ends up with magic what does or does not count based and whatever the argument they are in. CICO models doesn't state anything they claim, but it in the en
11.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
So how do we calculate Calories In and Out according to you? Becausr it sounds like that we have to deal with real world that really complex digestion, hormones, gut biome. You just start adding and subtracting numbers. At that moment CICO
12.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
They do have glucose metabolism[0], but that is the issue with CICO model already you have to start making extra rules about what is digestable and what is not. Calories doesn't state that all. Offcourse it wouldn't because the Ca
13.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
I'm afraid that is incorrect, type 1 diabetes still have glucose metabolism, with diabetes type 2 glucose metabolism could be impaired but with type 1 that is not the case. What has changed is that without insulin glucose will stay in
14.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
That's the point it will not lead to weight gain. But according to CICO they should become fat, but they won't. And if this is possible by not having one hormone. That is quite a big discovery. The human body is way more complex t
15.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
They are genetic outliers because are able to operate at a elite level, but if you would learn more about sport and nutrition then those diets wouldn't look so extreme. They are eating goal based diets, that's different diet then
16.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Calories concept is from 1819.[0] Are you aware how calories are measured? [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorie
17.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
yup, Someone might even die because of refeeding syndrome.[0] Continuing on your point the body is there not a closed system as defined as: > In a closed system, no mass may be transferred in or out of the system boundaries. The system a
18.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
The question how do we explain why people without insulin are able to stay thin, while eating massive amounts of calories with the CICO model. Because that case is breaking the model. Since your stating that eating once a day is the same as
19.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
They are unit of energy and that is correct. But they are not the unit of energy that cells use, they use ATP that is created from ketones, fatty-acids, glucose and oxygen[0] Measuring food through calories, which are derived from burning f
20.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
During the exercise the body is in a state of flight or flight[0], the other mode is rest and digest. So during hunger will go away, but the body will want to be able to exert the same or more(because that amount was at least needed), and a
21.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
The body is not closed system if it would be perfect close system then eating once a day or once per week would have the same effect spreading that over the day. The cells do not use calories. They use ATP, converted different pathways such
22.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Reading about the diet of DK Metcalf that is Low carb, Intermittent fasting, with plenty of vegetables is according to the latest science. Eddie Hall has goal based diets, Normal people wouldn't be able to process the amount of food he
23.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
It means that are other metrics such as torque, Fuel economy, Noise/Vibration, Power-to-weight ratio. Here is a link to the metrics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicular_metrics Here is video explaining why hor
24.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
The reason it's so difficult, to almost impossible to get fat on those foods you have listed. Is because you'll become too full to overeat. Not only is it healthier for plethora of reasons. But you'll eat less. On top of that
25.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Obviously since some of them dance around the topic, and won't say outright say it. We just have the occasional hiccups during interviews where they give it away. naturals shouldn't take advice from people that juiced up. The amou
26.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
"I just barely started taking creatine. And what I do know of their opinions are squarely against them - this is why I was asking for concrete examples" That is great example you found, there way more. Because creatine is one of m
27.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Because I've actually watched their content, Some of them are open about it, some are not. Other commenters in this thread now about it. But you are not aware while linking their content? But selling programs based on pictures that ha
28.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
The original article is encouraging that even little bit of daily exercise is great. But the links are about doing conventional gym stuff. If you take steroids your body will respond different then normal people. Using steroids and then to
29.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Actually that is right. Horsepower is quite meaningless, engines of today with same horsepower will out perform 40 years old engines in all metrics that are important to us.
30.
▲
by
mister_mister
4y ago
Yeah, It's starting point. if it would lead into Macro and micro nutrients that would be great.
More ›