misc228

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by misc228 7y ago

   justinjlynn: Yes, they are violating the copyright license. Yes they should be sued. Perens and his lawyers are correct.
2. 2.▲
   by misc228 7y ago

   Redhat distributes it's sources to everyone, thus making any violation of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause acedemic to the linux copyright holders who would be the claimants. GRSecurity successfully prevents redistribution:
3. 3.▲
   by misc228 7y ago

   That is not a "work around". That is a BLATANT in-writing VIOLATION of the no-restrictions-on-redistribution clause GRSecurity MUST follow in-order to have the PERMISSION to create derivative works. GRSecurity IS violating the cop
4. 4.▲
   by misc228 7y ago

   They are blatantly violating the copyrights of the linux licensors, as far as we know. The linux licensors should sue. Another option is to simply revoke the license: Brad Spengler has (as far as we know) a gratis (free) license from the ma
5. 5.▲
   by misc228 7y ago

   GRSecurity is violating the GPL, and thus violating the linux programmers copyrights, as Bruce Perens explained: https://linux.slashdot.org/story/17/07/09/188246/bruce-peren... http://per