mimixco

48 ms·

481.
Mapping the most expensive zip codes in the US(propertyshark.com)
1 points by mimixco 6y ago|0 comments
482.
QUBE interactive TV demo (1978)(youtube.com)
1 points by mimixco 6y ago|0 comments
483.
What is inside a Lava Lamp?(youtube.com)
12 points by mimixco 6y ago|1 comments
484.
by mimixco 6y ago
It would only be easier to find security problems if someone actually audits your code, which probably won't be free. A good solution is to use an existing service with strong data protections to hold your actual content and then build
485.
Doordash says in IPO its pay model is a risk to its business(vice.com)
1 points by mimixco 6y ago|0 comments
486.
by mimixco 6y ago
Exactly this. Most of the software others will build with GPL'd stuff isn't interesting to the owner of the original code. They're not doing it to fix bugs. They're doing it to add stuff for their own products. No commun
487.
by mimixco 6y ago
HBO follow-up to their 2004 documentary, Hacking Democracy.
488.
Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections(m.imdb.com)
1 points by mimixco 6y ago|1 comments
489.
by mimixco 6y ago
Saw this when it came out. A must-watch for anyone interested in our voting process, which is quite vulnerable in ways HN folks will easily understand. The film was produced by HBO and is full of alarming examples and demos.
490.
by mimixco 6y ago
Surely. We can have both. Red Hat, for example, gives you the source after you pay for a license. This is how it was at IBM years ago in the mainframe world.
491.
by mimixco 6y ago
Taking away the political terms like contribute and community (which are not in the GPL license text), the actual license requires the 2nd developer to do two things that are contentious. Release the source to his own mods to the first pers
492.
by mimixco 6y ago
The good reason is that GPL's requirement that I make my source code and build instructions available to my licensed customers (paid customers only, btw, if I want) doesn't actually help the original developer at all. Is he or she
493.
by mimixco 6y ago
Exactly. I don't know where the phrase "contribute to the community" came from but it's not in the GPL license text. All you have to do to comply is make your own source code available on request to users who accept your
494.
by mimixco 6y ago
The premise that copyleft licenses force or encourage devs to "contribute back to the community" (the most common claim) is ridiculous. Contribute what? And to whose community? Let's say you've written a library and publ
495.
by mimixco 6y ago
Yes, it should. Mark Cuban says all the time that you cannot outsource your critical tech skills. He rejects all tech investments that don't have a tech expert (in the product domain) as a founder. In my own experience, not being a dev
496.
Several U.S. utilities back out of deal to build NuScale nuclear plant(sciencemag.org)
3 points by mimixco 6y ago|0 comments
497.
by mimixco 6y ago
The book of the same title is terrific and highly recommend.
498.
by mimixco 6y ago
Yes, I was! Thanks.
499.
by mimixco 6y ago
I thought XPath was pretty terrific for the day. It let you transform XML into a user interface in an entirely declarative way -- not just the appearance of items like CSS but the actual content could be inspected and altered. I built some
500.
by mimixco 6y ago
Just taking a very brief look at this and it seems like a great idea! They've basically "unbundled" something like Shopify and are selling the individual parts (embeded Buy Now button, data export, etc.) separately for a mont
501.
by mimixco 6y ago
Yes. Managers want "no code" because devs are expensive and make lots of mistakes. They believe some software will fix that, not realizing that all software is devs, all the way down.
502.
by mimixco 6y ago
It may be offline already. The app no longer works. Well, Flipped was good but not worth paying for and the dual screen mode thing added nothing but expense for them.
503.
by mimixco 6y ago
My name is David Bethune and I'm the founder of Mimix. My co-founder Rommel Martinez and I have spent the last year building an interpreter and hybrid database for a new text processing language called MSL. Today, we're delighted
504.
A new programming language and tools for fact-checking(wiki.mimix.io)
1 points by mimixco 6y ago|1 comments
505.
by mimixco 6y ago
This is a scathing review from someone for whom the device is clearly not intended. Most reviewers of the Surface Duo seem to come from an entirely different audience than the phone appeals to. On the build quality, thinness, and "work
506.
A Tiny Review of the Microsoft Surface Duo
3 points by mimixco 6y ago|0 comments
507.
by mimixco 6y ago
We've been working on an alternative to SemWeb based on a new language for marking up facts inside of text. It doesn't rely on schema but allows the user to define fact relationships as they happen in writing. More info here: htt
508.
by mimixco 6y ago
There are no screenshots or demos of the product, so that was the end for me. Not good to ask for a signup just to let someone see what you're selling.
509.
by mimixco 6y ago
One thing non-Sonos owners might not realize about their business model is that it is the opposite of subscriptions. Because the software is so cool (creating an infinite jukebox out of all your music sources and subscriptions, both local
510.
by mimixco 6y ago
The OP writes that Sonos speakers can function without an internet connection which is entirely untrue and what differentiates the product from others in the market. Sonos speakers access the net and your streaming music accounts by themsel

More ›