Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mikejb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
I'm wondering how one gets stranded before leaving on a trip (and that group makes up 75% of stranded people) It's 150k UK vs. 600k total holidaymakers.
62.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
The detail is in the title: 150k UK holiday makers vs. 600k total
63.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
You don't even have to go that far - imagine China flying combat drones over US territory. The US is a military power house, and they use and abuse this power to maintain their ways of life, no matter the costs to others.
64.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> There comes a time when YOU would strap on a bomb belt. Just imagine that They killed half your family and then goes on telling you they will continue doing it... It's not that hard to imagine - after 9/11, people did enlist
65.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
"World police" sounds nice, but the US military is what it is: the military force of a country, ensuring that countries interests, and little else.
66.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Correct, though there are multiple interpretations of what a "regex" is. In the theoretical sense you're correct, though some (most programmers, I'd say) mean "PCRE" when they say regex. And PCREs are pretty po
67.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
I don't live in the US, and the consequences of this aren't 100% clear to me, but am I correct in assuming - Members of the NRA are now 'domestic terrorists', i.e. when entering the US they have to tick the "I'
68.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Maybe the silliness of your argument can be highlighted with a small modification: > How awful of the Confederacy to fight for a right to slaves. Societies change and evolve. The desperate clinging to ancient, outdated concepts won'
69.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
The judge from the Google vs. Uber litigation referred the case to the US attorney. Looks like they found enough evidence to charge him. Not sure how Google is involved in this "harassment".
70.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> All the claims are strictly true. They just carry a moral judgement some people disagree with, and most people don't care about. This is a poor standard. For example: > Kim Jong-un is an elected leader It's technically cor
71.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Probably to understand motive, and check for potential involvement of others. And whilst they have a metric shit-ton of spying capabilities on US civilians, those are not really intended to avoid crime. (Maybe the shift of perception of wha
72.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> If Google had more business in China, the CCP could blackmail them into censoring their results in other countries as well. It's easily forgotten that the nation currently lead by Donald Trump already has this power of internation
73.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Whilst I understand where the author is coming from, I'm not sure the companies are to blame here. > Two years ago, under the guise of complying with American sanctions against Iran — sanctions that have existed for decades — Apple
74.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
I'm not sure what the comparison is on Chrome vs. Firefox. I've had the pain of these slow animations, with a follow-up captcha, and it's infuriating - On Chrome. Is it better on Firefox?
75.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Some posts in that thread suggest[1] an application called Gramblr could be responsible for it - an application used to upload content to Instagram. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/ap6brw/gr
76.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
The argument was that the NYT article is not talking about blue-collar jobs . The NYT article is talking about 121000 contractors. Either Google has 121000 white-collar contractors, or the article also talks about blue-collar jobs.
77.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
They talk about one example from 121000 contractors - are you sure they don't include blue collar jobs?
78.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
I think EASA doesn't trust the FAA here because the FAA had less involvement in the original certification than some are comfortable with. So rather that asking the FAA to certify the entire plane and maybe risk a similar procedure (Bo
79.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> If you decide to browse the web without uBlock Origin or if you decide to use Android, you know what you're being exposed to. Time to step out of the bubble of tech-savvy people and talk to everyday users. It's unrealistic to
80.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> What exactly are they afraid of? Exposing the level of detail in the data accumulated. This starts at "opened the messenger app at this location on this date&time" and goes to "visited this Facebook-unrelated website
81.
▲
Ex-NSA official charged with leaking classified drone documents
(theguardian.com)
2 points
by
mikejb
7y ago
|
0 comments
82.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Yes, Waymo has paying customers that ride in cars that have demonstrated the capability to navigate populated city streets without a driver. I think calling Waymo the market leader is a fair assessment.
83.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
I generally agree with you on the Tesla marketing issues, but it's not entirely as black and white: The driver reported issues at that very location multiple times, and complained about AP not working reliably. The driver definitely wa
84.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
And this is related how to your original post? (To be honest, you give the impression to blame the rejection on your skin colour when the alternative option is less comfortable: Someone thought you're not qualified to do the 'f#*c
85.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> Google did not hire me because I'm a Black Man. Can you elaborate on how you got to that conclusion? We don't have insights on how the interview went (not from your, nor the interviewers' perspective), so it's hard
86.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Because it doesn't rain tons of water in less than a second.
87.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
Just as a Side-note: that video is from the Falcon Heavy demo launch last year. The recent launch was the first commercial Falcon Heavy launch (Arabsat 6a)
88.
▲
by
mikejb
7y ago
> The Apollo 11 command module is there, too Temporarily though. Normally it's exhibited at the Smithsonian in Washington DC (Which is also absolutely worth a visit).
89.
▲
by
mikejb
8y ago
>But loaning money, doing the work with your own employees, suggesting infrastructure that they can hardly afford ( and definitely not maintain), burying the country in debt is something new. Is it? Having your own companies build infras
90.
▲
by
mikejb
8y ago
Amongst others, yes.
More ›