mikeiavelli

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mikeiavelli 1y ago

   I only skimmed it, but I want to point out to the author that in his slope equation, the slope is denoted by m, not x. But yes, using the Laplacian seems natural as a metric for what he wants to measure. Coming from a physics background tho
2. 2.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   From the paper "Pólya’s conjecture for Euclidean balls" https://dms.umontreal.ca/~iossif/polya.pdf "The celebrated Pólya’s conjecture (1954) in spectral geometry states that the eigenvalue counting funct
3. 3.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   Maxwell was deeply influenced by Faraday's work but he was not his student: he first noticed Faraday’s work while he was at Cambridge in the 1850s. He found a way to translate Faraday’s experimental findings (expressed as the interacti
4. 4.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   ...but then, what material did you expect as a beginner?
5. 5.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   "All you need are better titles!"
6. 6.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   > Wolfram stumbled upon something quite profound that (from my perspective) is under appreciated by the majority of working physicists and mathematicians: Computation arises from very simple axiomatic systems I disagree that his work off
7. 7.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   (Emergent systems I guess.)
8. 8.▲
   by mikeiavelli 3y ago

   Have you seen the stuff he "works on" lately? What a pretentious use of pseudo-scientific jargon that means absolutely nothing. If someone piles on layers upon layers of concepts over many years, but nobody else uses those concept