Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mikecb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
241.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
That's a statutory maximum, not a guideline or even remotely likely sentence.
242.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
It does have a prioritize feature in the app.
243.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Not quite true. 42 USC 1983 provides for a right of action for violation of constitutional rights including attorney's fees.
244.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Exactly what I said, just don't attribute it to Ben Franklin.
245.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Eventually the UK may decide that no one should be monitored without probably cause, but suggesting that any portion of society, especially those with power, should be exempt from a regime the rest of society is subject to is a worse propos
246.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
This quote is taken egregiously out of context.[1] You could still say its a nice quote, but its power comes from an appeal to authority, in this case, a founding father, and despite the fallacy inherent in such a tactic, the extent to whic
247.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Roman law even.
248.
▲
Google Cloud Datalab – ipython as a service
(cloud.google.com)
4 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
3 comments
249.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Ben Sloss' comment is pretty funny. But seriously, the presentations given by Amin Vahdat (who gives the keynote at ONS pretty much every year), and Urs are pretty amazing. It does make one wonder how much AWS and Microsoft are doing i
250.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
And then you get violations without the exclusionary remedy, which seems weird to everyone.
251.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Judges on a tier below a decision are bound by the higher court's ruling. This is mandatory precedent. Judges on the same tier are not strictly bound, but in the interest of consistency (the law always seeks to be applied in the same w
252.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
More easily, the House and Senate are able to promulgate their own rules. Since the rules of things like consideration limits and cloture are not enshrined in the Constitution, but rather in House and Senate rules, they are free to pass a l
253.
▲
Google Cloud Shell
(cloud.google.com)
325 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
159 comments
254.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
A pin can be phished, a U2F handshake cannot.
255.
▲
US Gov finds its style
(18f.gsa.gov)
12 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
0 comments
256.
▲
Google's partially homomorphic bigquery client
(github.com)
2 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
0 comments
257.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
They're going to have to work hard to top this. I'm an inside counsel guy, but I'd love a clock that counts in dollars.
258.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
They had a bigger problem: modeling with the wrong distribution.
259.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
No one is saying you should build this in your back office. My comment was limited (by the first bit) to people utilizing public clouds and those who run public clouds. If you are, you are affected by these issues; if you are not, then ther
260.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
I think this is short-sighted. Everyone who operates with any portion of their stack on any cloud provider is "operating at Google's scale" since even a small service is affected both by the infrastructure on which it is run
261.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Mail the HDDS.
262.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Directives are generally binding, but leave implementation to member states.
263.
▲
OPM shuts down e-QIP web-based background check application after vuln is found
(opm.gov)
1 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
0 comments
264.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
That's true in the lower court, but here, Google is the petitioner, so as the movant, their name goes first. See the docket: http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfile...
265.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
This leaves in place the ruling of the Federal Circuit, which ruled that the Java APIs in this case were copyrightable, though it left open the possibility that Google had a fair use defense.
266.
▲
Supreme Court denies review of Google v. Oracle API copyright case [pdf]
(supremecourt.gov)
107 points
by
mikecb
11y ago
|
106 comments
267.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
That article describes previous grants of trade promotion authority, while this grant of authority, by all reports, will require more stringent and lengthier consultation and public notice requirements. Edit: Sec. 6 contains the public noti
268.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
They may be able to, depending on Indian Court's jurisprudence on personal jurisdiction, but unless they have assets in India, the Indian judgement would have to be brought to the United States for enforcement. The U.S. has laws and pr
269.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
Just to note, if you like Stan it has a python lib just as much as an R one, and Julia, MATLAB, etc (Stan itself is written in c++). As for vis, yhat wrote a python version of ggplot: http://ggplot.yhathq.com/
270.
▲
by
mikecb
11y ago
I doubt it: https://www.android.com/intl/en_us/work/
More ›