mikecb

32 ms·

271.
by mikecb 11y ago
Probably. Border has a lot more from the original congress, and more also about customs since that was one of the original boarder exceptions.
272.
by mikecb 11y ago
Finally, the zero trust network has its day. I've been following this for quite a while, especially since this kind of architecture makes even more sense for smaller businesses than large ones that can pay for sophisticated network-edg
273.
by mikecb 11y ago
It's a little weird because in '67, the court redefined the 4th around the idea of expectation of privacy (Katz), and Miller and Smith followed from that redefinition. So you might have happened across something relevant under the
274.
by mikecb 11y ago
They've made other scale distinctions though, for example Terry, with limits on length and scope of the stop in relation to the lower suspicion level, and others, so its not a ridiculous proposition.
275.
by mikecb 11y ago
How do you think the decision is made to insert a safebrowsing interstitial?
276.
by mikecb 11y ago
I imagine they're thinking of something like ARGUS, detailed in a great PBS program called "Rise of the Drones"
277.
by mikecb 11y ago
Indeed, and there's where we need mosaic the most. As it stands, the collection of this type of data (Smith) is not even a search, and therefore the court does not even consider whether or not it was reasonable. It just stops there. If
278.
by mikecb 11y ago
Mosaic theory doesn't go that far, but in the age of widespread statistical inference, it is an important development. Generally speaking, the public is entitled to all evidence. Certain rights, such as the Fifth amendment, protect you
279.
by mikecb 11y ago
What you describe is a statutory challenge. A constitutional challenge would be that the statute authorizing the conduct went beyond the enumerated powers in the Constitution, or that the conduct went beyond the President's inherent Ar
280.
by mikecb 11y ago
The constitutional challenge was dismissed because it was found to be constitutional under existing jurisprudence. See discussion in the lower court's memorandum opinion and order starting on the bottom of page 38[1]. Smith v. Maryland
281.
Google I/O schedule(events.google.com)
3 points by mikecb 11y ago|0 comments
282.
by mikecb 11y ago
You read my comment wrong. It wasn't making a point, it was stating a fact that there isn't just one agency responsible for network security in the Federal Government. Your point is the more important one. The danger here is not t
283.
by mikecb 11y ago
Sounds like a mention in passing of the most likely culprit by a background source turned into definitive proof in original article, then all other media repeat ad nauseum. This is a very typical newscycle, and doesn't mean officials h
284.
by mikecb 11y ago
These networks would be under the white house communications agency, a subset of the defense information systems agency which is not affiliated with NSA. Supposedly his blackberry is run through NSA (See, e.g., the fishbowl project), and wa
285.
by mikecb 11y ago
CLI access perhaps, though there is a third party solution out there for that too. I just use chrome, which now works offline, can drag and drop into it, though not out of it, but it works well enough that I've never tried to install t
286.
by mikecb 11y ago
Since we have someone who worked on these projects here, there was a report a couple of years ago about Borg and its successor, then called Omega. Is Kubernetes related to / a renamed Omega? Edit: Wired story: http://www.wir
287.
by mikecb 12y ago
Rayiner already addressed point 1, so I'll take a swing at 3. Most legal systems, demonstrated here by the ABA model rules of professional conduct for lawyers, would not consider this a conflict of interest, unless the lawyer were argu
288.
by mikecb 12y ago
This reads like it was written by the Zombo.com guy. I say that in a positive way.
289.
by mikecb 12y ago
Loved this one, but also expected https://google or https://google . to resolve. Instead I get an nxdomain, shouldn't it return noerror, since google clearly exists? Will we ever see bare tlds?
290.
by mikecb 12y ago
Looks like the drawings feature in Google Docs.
291.
by mikecb 12y ago
This is Samsung Knox, or rather its evolution.
292.
by mikecb 12y ago
That's what OMB is supposedly going to release.
293.
by mikecb 12y ago
Sundar says this is rolling out: https://twitter.com/sundarpichai/status/568479868427632640
294.
by mikecb 12y ago
I found only an unverified but specific claim in an ars forum thread that they run current on their CDN: http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1262749&sta...
295.
by mikecb 12y ago
Link for those interested: http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=1269&sid=3801434
296.
by mikecb 12y ago
Indeed. I was eager to learn more about their specific strategy to achieve it.
297.
by mikecb 12y ago
How long until that list of yours is just *.gov?
298.
by mikecb 12y ago
Not to mention being able to quickly pinpoint the problem as Y or Z and recommend a Y or Z expert to address it directly.
299.
by mikecb 12y ago
Read starting on page 3[1], where it explains the case law. [1] http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/Courses/nat-sec/2009s/InreTerrori...
300.
by mikecb 12y ago
The implication is that the simple majority in congress would be against these regulations and pass a bill to stop them. However, if the President supports these regulations promulgated under existing statutory authority, he would veto any

More ›