mikecb

48 ms·

451.
by mikecb 12y ago
True, and they are welcome to do so, though France might not be in the best position given the breadth and depth of its reported economic espionage of specific trade secrets and such.
452.
by mikecb 12y ago
I couldn't find the original source "Aktenkriegerì, SZ, 29 March 2001", but it sounds like a news report. If you can find the source, I would be happy to read it and judge it based upon its reported sources.
453.
by mikecb 12y ago
That's not the same thing as stealing trade secrets and giving them to a domestic company.
454.
by mikecb 12y ago
| 2.78 DM to 3.13 GBP. I think they mean between 2.78 and 3.13 DM per GBP.
455.
by mikecb 12y ago
I think that's going to be Susan Rice, since it says ambassador. Condoleeza was NatSec Advisor and then SecState. Also it takes place in 2010, long after Condoleeza Rice left government.
456.
by mikecb 12y ago
It's probably the most used among Federal agencies, including top level departments: https://groups.drupal.org/government-sites#USA
457.
by mikecb 12y ago
That's exactly the recent criticism of 'big data': engineers and others getting correlations they don't understand from all the data they can collect, and attempting to use them for who knows what.
458.
by mikecb 12y ago
It was John Hargrave from zug.com, but I think zug is no longer with us.
459.
by mikecb 12y ago
Looks like he has two accounts too...
460.
by mikecb 12y ago
If we're going to have polls like this, can we at least use proper questions? These, and the other one's questions are compound and weighted toward lack of trust. This is a solved space.
461.
by mikecb 12y ago
While that is a possibility, there's nothing to suggest it is stronger than the reported id of the plane, so I'll stick with U-2.
462.
by mikecb 12y ago
More details, and more expert analysis, available at the Aviationist[1]. [1] http://theaviationist.com/2014/05/03/u-2-freezes-lax-radar/
463.
by mikecb 12y ago
U-2s don't fly very fast (~500mph). For comparison, a 747 cruises at about 570mph.
464.
by mikecb 12y ago
I use it for photos because it's amazing. I can upload RAWs and they turn out at least as well as I can do them by hand, plus the auto-awesome thing makes great extras (the pano's are pretty great). Increasingly following experts
465.
by mikecb 12y ago
I thought that at first, and that could indeed be one thing he's saying. But I also agree with jmount that he probably understands that any tinkering is likely to produce as many bugs as it fixes, and therefore implementation changes
466.
by mikecb 12y ago
I can't reconcile the two quotes, but I've never encountered someone with more attention to detail.
467.
by mikecb 12y ago
I love Knuth for things like this: "although I did delete a few bytes of redundant source code and alter two names." He knows what he wants it to do, it need do nothing else, and in pursuit of that, he'll refine even the most
468.
by mikecb 12y ago
A Watson of your very own.
469.
by mikecb 12y ago
What do you think the bid would be? I'm thinking 100 billion.
470.
by mikecb 12y ago
I laughed.
471.
by mikecb 12y ago
The article points here: http://stats.grok.se/
472.
by mikecb 12y ago
This, along with Google and others devoting employees like Neel Mehta to it should go a long way.
473.
by mikecb 13y ago
CIA is not under DoS. It is an independent executive agency that reports directly to the President.
474.
by mikecb 13y ago
That was in 1997 though. As was the Asian crash and Russia default (which partly caused LTCM), so there are plenty of other reasons for the Fed action.
475.
by mikecb 13y ago
Tailored.
476.
by mikecb 13y ago
All the briefs, just for you: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/alice-corporation...
477.
by mikecb 13y ago
That's in the 9 fortunes file is it not?
478.
by mikecb 13y ago
And the cipher list is crap: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=theintercept....
479.
by mikecb 13y ago
Though for some reason they're going state by state.
480.
by mikecb 13y ago
I would not have expected US to be at 6.5%, though I suppose vzw helps a lot.

More ›