mikebroberts

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   The Future of Serverless Compute(infoq.com)

   7 points by mikebroberts 10y ago|0 comments
2. 2.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   Hi Mike, Article author here. Don't worry, I'll be laying on some cold, hard, reality later in the series. I definitely don't encourage SPAs universally and I'll be talking extensively about the concerns of handing ove
3. 3.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   Welcome to Old Developers Club. :)
4. 4.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   There's definitely a performance tradeoff, one which I reference a little in the latest part and will definitely talk about more when I get to drawbacks (likely in the 5th update.) There's definitely a big class of applications wh
5. 5.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   If you are able to do that you would have my appreciation as the article author! :)
6. 6.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   The latest installment just went live - conveniently I offer a comparison to PaaS in it (in that I think there are significant differences between PaaS and FaaS)
7. 7.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   Thanks - yes the 'serverless' name isn't great, especially without the clarification of 'server-application-less', which was one of the drivers to me writing the article. I'm not in love with FaaS as a name (ye
8. 8.▲
   by mikebroberts 10y ago

   Hi, this article was actually written by me, @mikebroberts, but Martin graciously asked if I could host on his site. I don't work for ThoughtWorks but did a decade ago.