migsvult

4 ms·

1.
by migsvult 8mo ago
This is very cool. And very timely. Recently had a discussion on whether we wanted to build out a new video pipeline through weavy or something more declarative like this. Surprised that there don't seem to be many similar tools. I
2.
by migsvult 8mo ago
This post mentions apps used as an individual. I think that more or less makes sense for some subset of engineers that enjoy this type of weekend project. But once you extend this out to an org, and you're saving a sub for every &#x2
3.
by migsvult 5y ago
As other have pointed out, most money is already digital. This is really about retail bank accounts at central banks, and how how this gives policy makers additional tools. Which..... seems fine? As long as companies can build products on
4.
by migsvult 11y ago
> Taking cash from the economy, which is a productive asset, useful for investment, and purchasing land which you plan to do nothing with, is most definitely an economic loss. There is no question about this step. No man. The cash doesn
5.
by migsvult 11y ago
Well yeah obviously. The entire point of the scheme is to lower our coal usage by shifting into less economically efficient forms of energy. That strictly implies lower overall economic output. If fact, any emission-lowering scheme (beside
6.
by migsvult 11y ago
"First, most billionaires don't just have billions in cash laying around usable to buy things. ... The economic loss from this step would be huge." There would be no economic loss. In real terms, the companies that the billi
7.
by migsvult 11y ago
two thoughts 1. In the 70's and the 80's our Soviet counter-intel was fairly compromised. Aldrich Ames and Robert Hassan are just the biggest examples. That probably does a better job explaining a Soviet CI advantage than '