middleorigin

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   However you view it, the damage is done.
2. 2.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   ...which are again on Sony for signing in the first place. I mean it's their right to be a purely gaming console, but they should also accept blame for tanking their reputation with the open source community.
3. 3.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   Right, but you're describing the implementation, which doesn't imply anything about its use. I prefer to name by the latter: the implemenation is just a detail on how the filter does its filtering.
4. 4.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   Right, nobody is arguing that facebook doesn't have a right to do this. It's just alarming that eg the NyTimes portray it as facebook's responsibility. EDIT: apparenty people do talk about free speech, but they seem unaware o
5. 5.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   There's not much money in getting people to use it—it's rarely required and can be expensive to train for (as opposed to java, say).
6. 6.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   Hmm so it doesn't work well with variable length data?
7. 7.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   I have no idea why you think the name helps remove the need for a visualization. Besides I think "filter" is more apt than "table"—it doesn't store anything per se.
8. 8.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   I feel comfortable in blaming Sony for this. At one point I would have paid for an open ps3, say without the gpu, but these are lost sales now.
9. 9.▲
   by middleorigin 9y ago

   Wait, ports are considered moving parts?