Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
michannne
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I honestly doubt any one who says that they are productive for 40 full hours a week, or even 6 hours per day. There's a lot of downtime that employees usually do not notice from a first person perspective. Even still, the goal of IT is
92.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I work remote at a startup. I don't think that's a repeatable strategy but it does allow me to work very little hours throughout the week and spend most of my time relaxing with my family. It also helps being decent enough at my j
93.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Thanks for the clarification!
94.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
That's an ideal. At the end of the day these are human-run industries, relationships are a big part of that.
95.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Especially ridiculous considering they have a site, a very professional one, at that
96.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
You're perfectly free to decide how you view someone based on what they've said. My issue is do not then assume that everyone who isn't as offended is somehow being unreasonable or that the world has descended into nonsense.
97.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
>I don’t think it’s hyperbole to say that we are at the beginning of a war We are not at the beginning of a war. I recommend you go outside for a breath of fresh air.
98.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
The difference between a generalized, customizable solution like Salesforce, and something like Palantir, is that customers go to Palantir because they don't know what to do with their data - they're stuck and need advice on how t
99.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Ok, if the government says, "Hey Palantir, we have this data and we need you to group everyone by religion and political affiliation", is it then also Palantir's fault if the government uses that resulting analysis for discri
100.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Yet it is, but for the sake of fast-forwarding the disagreement, let's assume for now that Drake, or any other male rapper celebrity, or any other celebrity period, or any semi-famous man has never in private conversation talked about
101.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
It still doesn't make any sense. Tell me: is the bus driver culpable if the murderer took the bus to get away from the scene of the crime?
102.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I can't reply to your other post, presumably because the thread is too deep. For one, you continue to make assumptions about me. By all means feel free, if this year has been any indication I can only expect the vilification of anyone
103.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I honestly cannot see why you'd think I would listen to what he said and use that to form a general opinion of his leadership capabilities. How one talks about fondling random women is not something I'd use as a measure of their a
104.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Yes of course, because anyone who would dare to not fill their post with detriment of the president, must in fact also support the president, contrary to any information otherwise. Assume what you want, I don't support Trump and appa
105.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
We could always go with the assumption the president is a bumbling idiot who can't tie his shoes properly. I'm sure that characterization will help understand the deeper picture here. /s You fail to see the point. I don'
106.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
You do realize Barack Obama fucked his wife right? Multiple times as they have 2 children. They probably talk dirty to each other when they're alone, like almost every other couple that exists. Should I now think less of Obama on the o
107.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I don't see the point of any of those examples. You don't blame the bank when fraud happens through it's accounts unless the bank knowingly let it happen, your second example is a false equivalence as selling ammo to another
108.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Vitriol aside, I suggest you adopt a more objective view of politics, instead of allowing your personal emotions to guide your view of governmental affairs. For one, TikTok is not the target, it is just the first domino of many, intended to
109.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
I would hope the majority of people who are aware of international affairs do not think so lowly of the American people, so dimly of American government, and so shallowly of international politics, that they'd believe our president wou
110.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Yeah, I understand that platforms like Steam also take huge chunks, even Amazon, for hosting, providing visibility and other such features. Still, 1/3 of my revenue is ALOT of money
111.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Tensorflow. Also the MSDN, specifically for .NET. I think having relevant examples explaining the impact of the arguments is more important than a dry explanation of the function itself.
112.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Huh? They build a tool. If it's not Palantir then it'll be someone else, likely the NSA. I'd be surprised if they aren't already investigating ways to analyze without Palantir's help. Your scorn is misguided
113.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
There's no reason that with chip technology as ubiquitous as it is that card readers shouldn't be more widespread. The fact that they aren't right now shows that the market isn't there
114.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
The point is to have a way for the user to use their card without a device, and a way to keep the encryption. If you have a USB you've lost point #1
115.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Seems ridiculous to have to buy a device just to use my card. I would have to carry it around as well otherwise I wouldn't be able to use my card online
116.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
Credit card fraud, as in transaction fraud, usually online. It's a lot less common for your physical card to be the issue in a fraud situation, so improving security there is moot
117.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
At that point why even show the number? It would be useless without the encryption. And if you have some way to enter the numbers so online transactions still work, then what is the point of the encryption? I don't believe the majority
118.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
How would encryption improve the security of a physical credit card?
119.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
That's an ideal. You have to be reasonable with the expectation that people are going to want to use their card in places where it isn't securely convenient to do so. Otherwise, you will end up creating a niche with no mass market
120.
▲
by
michannne
6y ago
The problem with that is the purpose of a credit card system is convenience, especially the convenience involved in being able to represent the identifier in an easily compact manner. When it's a few groups of digits, I can print it on
More ›