mgraczyk

27 ms·

541.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
There is a 9th circuit carve out for certain faculty speech in Demers v. Austin. Doesn't apply here but I think something like this could become a test case if she is fired? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demers_v._
542.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
If it were possible to manufacture towels that couldn't easily be stolen from hotels, then yes I would want that to be allowed. Hotels would like it, and guests who do not steal would benefit from lower prices. And more directly yes I
543.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Viewing the web as a platform for delivering applications, Web Integrity is an obviously good thing that I personally would use as a developer who makes software people pay for. The opposition listed here is mostly misguided. For example, t
544.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I think you'd be surprised by what's possible on mobile chips these days. They aren't going to be running the 70B model at useable speeds, but I think with enough optimization it should be possible to run the 7B and 13B model
545.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
The editor for people I'm talking about is running locally on the desktop. The user is viewing a window on a monitor attached to the desktop. How does this work without changing that workflow?
546.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
GPU
547.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
The in-browser editor at Google is actually very good and has built in debugging support. Some people still don't use it though, and this change seems to ignore that.
548.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
That doesn't make sense to me. You can't copy-paste into and out of your editor across machines. You see an error message on your desktop, you want to search for it. What do you do?
549.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Many people don't do that. They sit in front of a desktop with a monitor plugged into it and use the desktop for everything, including stack overflow etc
550.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Many people at Google still use desktop Linux workstations. Those would be airgapped too under this plan and force these people to change to another workflow. There are at least hundreds of people who have been there 10+ years still using d
551.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I would prefer not to subsidize other people the way you're describing.
552.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
You will end up adding things to your whitelist that you think are innocuous, but if that's all you do you will very likely end up discriminating and not even knowing it.
553.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Unfortunately this doesn't work, one of the basic things to know about ML fairness is that you generally can't get the outcomes you want by hiding things from your model. For example you can infer the race of a candidate from othe
554.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I just bought a new Macbook Pro and have been using it for ~1 week. Even compared to my previous 2019 Macbook Pro, it's a huge step up in build quality and speed. If you spend any time waiting for code to compile, web pages to load, or
555.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Yeah it's long story but I deposited a token I was able to mint via a bug I found in the smart contract. It's called "BatchOverflow" if you want to see the details. So no starting capital
556.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I did a similar thing with OKEx in 2018. Managed to accrue around $300,000 USD worth of BTC, but only managed to withdraw around $15k before I was permanently banned. Exchanges at the time and since aggressively market make their own books
557.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Yes the users want that content, but generally not as much as they want other content that Facebook could show instead
558.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I was at Facebook working on ranking when a similar thing happened with Australia. Showing news is a net negative for Facebook and probably not very positive for Google. Facebook's short and long term metrics were better without news.
559.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Yeah, I don't agree with that but it would be logical criticism of Google's position here.
560.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
The linked article has nothing to do with the harms of LLMs on the users of LLMs. Saying something like "Google is harming users and saying that their employees shouldn't be subjected to this harm" is misleading and off topic
561.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
You should read the article. Google is not claiming that LLMs will harm employees. Google is claiming that sending confidential data to third parties is not allowed and will leak that information. A more apt quote would be "Tobacco com
562.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
The first justification in the article is silly and detracts from Nature's position: "we all need to know the sources of data and images, so that these can be verified as accurate and true" How do you verify whether this cart
563.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
Second paragraph of the article: "Apart from in articles that are specifically about AI"
564.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
I was reading through this and thinking "oh this sounds interesting and useful for my work", then I got to Figure 1 and though, hmm these diagrams look very familiar. When I saw "Pixel 6" in Figure 2 I realized oh, this
565.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
> The halting problem tells us that it’s plausible that that instinct is right - that for some programs, you really can’t do some other analysis of the program that tells you what it’s going to do. You have to just run it. This isn'
566.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
It is true that some models define halting that way, but in this paper they explicitly do not.
567.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
This is wrong and directly contradicted, unambiguously by the linked paper. "For the purposes of defining the halting problem H, one should specify whether it officially counts as halting or not if the head should happen to fall off th
568.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
It does matter, the second and last sentence of the abstract is "The proof is sensitive to the particular computational models."
569.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
For some reason I remember reading that example.com will never have https, but I'm not sure that's true. It's what I use for now.
570.
by mgraczyk 3y ago
When I said "standard construction", I was referring to the combination of "serverless" and "GPU" to make "serverless GPU". Also you're factually wrong. Amazon didn't invent this term and it

More ›