mg794613

7 ms·

61.
by mg794613 2y ago
* No source for the number. * has "mostly from americans" (also no source) * brought to you by the same people suggesting you should get a second job to forget the stress from the first job.
62.
by mg794613 2y ago
Thats bad! Let's change that! Let's be better than our predecessors! Right? So, how do they suggest to tackle the problem? 1. Improve the science 2. Update the data or 3. Somehow focus on it being racist and then walking away lik
63.
by mg794613 2y ago
Yeah, there were voices like this with the advent of trains, electricity, light bulbs, ehm, maybe just everything.
64.
by mg794613 2y ago
Why is gender involved in this again? Ah, the Guardian. Where normally it should be data and general journalism that brings these issues to light, but we live in a age now where "reporters" take their “emerging and growing problem
65.
by mg794613 2y ago
Translation from corpo-legalese: Big Corp avoids any responsibility, normal citizen the big loser.
66.
by mg794613 2y ago
The language usage is a bit weird. It seems that caring at all if your child is yours is "obsession" and "fixation". Quite judgemental word choice for something rather normal.
67.
by mg794613 2y ago
This has been going on long before Trump even thought about going into politics. There is a reason the US does not recognize the ICC. And we also know they have the plans ready to free any soldier from the Netherlands _if_ we were to arrest
68.
by mg794613 2y ago
No, we don't "allign". We get pressured until we do what America wants us to do.
69.
by mg794613 2y ago
What? No. Nobody is turning to OnlyFans "due to a broken system". All the people in the comments here have normal jobs, so could these athetes. OnlyFans is a choice here.
70.
by mg794613 2y ago
They can easily stop it. Question is, will there be enough incentive for them to do so.
71.
by mg794613 2y ago
Euh weird this is coming from pcgamer, they put their eggs in the wrong basket and now try to save face?
72.
by mg794613 2y ago
It doesn't harm diversity. The world is a diverse place. Also, America's idea about "diversity" is extremely non-diverse. And quite frankly rather racist.
73.
by mg794613 2y ago
Ok wow, I did not expect to be actually entertained!
74.
by mg794613 2y ago
Yeah me, ndd couldn't be happier about it. Let others slave away for such horrible employers.
75.
by mg794613 3y ago
On their example page you can sometimes see what data it got to train on. https://imgur.com/a/CuXNATp for example is without a doubt "Ragnaros" from the game "World of Warcraft". Probably due to not
76.
by mg794613 3y ago
making notes
77.
by mg794613 3y ago
What is a good fpga starter board that's big enough to load this? It's not obvious from the repo as a complete novice in fpga land.
78.
by mg794613 4y ago
TBF he said commit, not attempt.
79.
by mg794613 4y ago
I don't however, it's not my cup of tea, but since when are payment processors, which are into money, into applying cultural norms?
80.
by mg794613 5y ago
Nor sure what this article is trying to convey? Is it about grepping wrong defaults for bash? Is it about mentioning the protagonist as much as often? I've read it twice now, and I feel ignorant.
81.
by mg794613 5y ago
Ah yes, the no-code dream of shareholders. ”Why pay those pesky developers if you can just click it together, how hard can it really be, I became CEO/sales/random-other-thing because I'm really smart, so this will be easy too
82.
by mg794613 5y ago
Nice how this article pus together people who want more flexibility in work location with people who hate work and try to work as less as possible. Makes you almost guess where theguardian.com owners stand on this issue.
83.
by mg794613 5y ago
Thew fact alone that sex is being put away as "ewwwww" shows where the real problem lies. Now master and slave was already somewhat ridiculous discussion. This discussion is really a flag waver, as there is no negative connotation
84.
by mg794613 5y ago
Guess who I will NEVER work for. Is this a normal way of treating your employees in the US?
85.
by mg794613 6y ago
Muddying the water is phrasing it well. Don't get me wrong. I think pseudoscience and racism etc. are all bad things that need to be solved as well. However adding them on one big pile does not make your cause better or make the proble
86.
by mg794613 6y ago
It's a bit further down, under the video.
87.
by mg794613 6y ago
I understood the point until the site stated "Emotion recognition software is largely seen as racist pseudoscience" and then link to facial recognition which is not related. You'd think these people are smart enough to not ov
88.
by mg794613 6y ago
A article with no new content about celebrities debauchery in the 80/90's? Is this vanity fair or HN?
89.
by mg794613 6y ago
Well the way it looks now, if they don't watch their steps they won't have a userbase with their latest trick they pulled.
90.
by mg794613 6y ago
Yeah not all subjects responded negatively, but I do believe a majority did, in the lesser happy sessions. I do think they took care of creating 'set and setting' more.

More ›