mfukar

46 ms·

451.
by mfukar 16y ago
I don't; and that wasn't my point.
452.
by mfukar 16y ago
I don't get it; when the Perl folk thought they had to reach the masses, instead of making Perl 5 more accessible to newbies, instead of covering Perl events (a comment on the blog mentions some specialized hardware for doing so - lol), ins
453.
by mfukar 16y ago
I'm going to draw an analogy from Larry Wall's own words: Python 3 is to Python 2 what Perl 6 is to Perl 5, a different language. Just because you had a bad experience with Python legacy code (yes, RHEL sucks), doesn't mean you get to discr
454.
by mfukar 16y ago
I follow all three (tptacek, @dakami, zedshaw), and at times I want to kill myself for using Twitter.
455.
by mfukar 16y ago
Query, with regard to paragraph #3: If someone can hack soawesome.com while the User is logged in, does she unconditionally gain the User's login credentials on soawesome.com, ie. can she impersonate the User on soawesome.com from that po
456.
by mfukar 16y ago
I don't know, but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say yes, based on the same general idea: if someone is smart enough to figure out that the (most) scenarios depicted in computer games are fantasy [1], I don't see any reason for her to not t
457.
by mfukar 16y ago
Actually, I think most people are able to realize that games don't portray reality.
458.
by mfukar 16y ago
> There is tons of male submissive porn. Google "femdom", "mistress porn", and so on. Especially Japanese. > People sexualize everything, so saying "there's no {x} porn" is false for almost all values of x. (Google "balloon porn" an
459.
by mfukar 16y ago
And redtube.com out of N is representative? Not to justify the grandparent's probably biased view (which I share btw), but arguing with ambiguous statements doesn't offer much to the discussion or our comprehension of the matter.
460.
Net neutrality? Not at the coffee shop(arstechnica.com)
2 points by mfukar 16y ago|0 comments
461.
by mfukar 16y ago
I'll certainly try to find some time for it.
462.
by mfukar 16y ago
Mine as well, I guess my comment was over the line.
463.
by mfukar 16y ago
The way you phrased your original post gave me the impression you were dismissing the constructor solution for the same reason tptacek dismissed the rest. I certainly agree with your point, as you may have read elsewhere in the thread. Othe
464.
by mfukar 16y ago
Well, neither C nor C++ are assembly, and vice versa. That's my usual response to this kind of "arguments", in every such question; boy do they come up a lot. Regardless, I'll repeat it; maybe it'll stick this time: i < 0 is a co
465.
by mfukar 16y ago
See, the trick is that while you don't approve, some others do.
466.
by mfukar 16y ago
I swear to god, I was tired of this argument before I even finished reading it. If you take your example to the extreme, you should consider that a processor also operates in a loop. Maybe every solution is a glorified series of iterations.
467.
by mfukar 16y ago
Holy crap, both those answers are genius.
468.
by mfukar 16y ago
If you want to get into language-lawyer mode, expressions are most certainly not conditional statements [in C]. But what's the use of arguing? "More gimmicky" answers don't count into solving a gimmicky problem? Who even keeps score? edit:
469.
by mfukar 16y ago
Maybe you wish to elaborate on what else is wrong with the article, other than a nitpick on what the author admitted was a spur of the moment?
470.
by mfukar 16y ago
Or as it was cleverly put before the author: " Primary rays cache; secondary rays thrash " Some interesting things to note, at least from my point of view: * GPUs should not be considered like the next generation CPUs at this stage. * Tryin
471.
by mfukar 16y ago
I'd love for this post to be a little more detailed, actually.
472.
by mfukar 16y ago
I'm sure there will be further attacks against it, but that is the last issue in play here. I'm sure this attitude will survive for many years to come, although it really shouldn't.
473.
by mfukar 16y ago
While you make fair points that I mostly agree with, I have a tiny nitpick: Lua isn't really a simpler Javascript; although I understand the point you were trying to make so I won't argue over it. :-)
474.
by mfukar 16y ago
Oh! Well, I suppose one can guess when I quit.. ;-)
475.
by mfukar 16y ago
If it didn't, it wouldn't have upwards of 6 million subscribers.
476.
by mfukar 16y ago
Wow. By far the most sexist thread on HN since I joined, huge props to us!
477.
by mfukar 16y ago
About 7 years old. I learned on a CPC 64 my uncle had - he had lost the CP/M tape, so all I was left with on first contact with the machine was a BASIC interpreter prompt (and the manuals). PEEKed and POKEd my way out of there pretty fast..
478.
by mfukar 16y ago
The burden of proof is on the accuser. Presumption of innocence, it's a bitch.
479.
by mfukar 16y ago
I find the fact that mr shaw chose today (see 27c3) to voice his "concerns" further adds to the amusement of his endeavour.
480.
by mfukar 16y ago
It's up to the Tor user to encrypt her end-to-end traffic. If that's what she wants.

More ›