mftf

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mftf 9y ago

   Perhaps the author does not understand the logistical nightmare of having human moderators manually approve all content. Further, the fact that YouTube, Facebook, et al. Have failed to police content to the author's satisfaction is not
2. 2.▲
   by mftf 9y ago

   They are words. Not bullets, not fists, not gropes. And the fact that there is such a movement to sensationalize what should be harmless to any well adjusted person only encourages the trolls. This is fundamentally different from in person
3. 3.▲
   by mftf 9y ago

   Why does HN allow articles like this to be posted if it suppresses any arguments against their validity or premise? This entire topic is flamebait, except only critical arguments are punished. This is dangerous, because it creates a false a
4. 4.▲
   by mftf 9y ago

   Not choosing a side, what is the justification for taxing foreign profits?