Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mfoy_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
87 ms
·
811.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
The fact that the EVE tokens even can be destroyed is always a source of amusement. Just google "eve killmail plex" and you'll find quite a few examples of players getting blown up while carrying thousands of dollars worth
812.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
The issue is that someone may happen across a cloned repo and have no idea it isn't the only, or original, one. So how would they look at recent updates and compare differences between the repos if they only know of the one?
813.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I like this idea as another possible interpretation of that data point. Essentially you're saying that it's because everyone's clicking the more conservative links which causes the skew, albeit for different reasons. The only
814.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
(Disclaimer: I didn't read the paper. I'm not sure if someone knows a link is cross-cutting before clicking it.) So if I'm reading that correctly, liberals are more likely to click on a cross-cutting article. That alone doe
815.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
>One of the failures of teaching a balanced history is to ignore what was going on in Asia in the run up to the war. No. That's one of the failures of POORLY teaching history. Don't confuse a "balanced history" with &
816.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
What "right to access culture"? Last I checked there was no such thing. At least not remotely in the way you seem to mean it. Even if there was, it certainly wouldn't define culture solely as "Hollywood movies and pop mu
817.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
That looks like it was a mess. :( For the lazy, the introduction of the complaint (at the bottom of the page): (Jan. 2014) "This is a civil action for damages brought by plaintiff Michael G. Schwern against his exwife, defendant Nóirín
818.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
"Data-driven" as in "we looked at some data and made a decision." Whether that was good data or bad data, lots of data or just a couple points, is out of scope. :p
819.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I would half-disagree. There are some high level parallels like you mentioned, but the Ted mail is attacking the statistic by it's definitions, whereas this article attacks the statistic directly because it has no basis in reality and
820.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I don't think this is an appropriate parallel... apples and oranges as it were. Admittedly, I only skimmed both articles, but this article appears to be about misinformation regarding recidivism rates affecting the judgment of legislat
821.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
They probably assumed that the cost of fixing the issue and actually pushing that fix to every unit in the field would outweigh the cost of not fixing it.
822.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Interesting article aside, was the shadowy ninja with a fedora really necessary?
823.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Presumably you can always just give important people your "real" number like you already do.
824.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Okay that inceptionism article is REALLY cool. This was my favourite image: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-FPDgxlc-WPU/VYIV1bK50HI/AAAAAAAAAl... It's a single image of a "cloud" as has been interpreted b
825.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
From the article: >1.All events have the properties of past, present and future, at the same time. >2.That these A-properties are incompatible (or mutually-exclusive) with one another. >A person may object to the first premise, acc
826.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Yeah, it kind of makes the entire thing 90% less interesting. Of course I assumed this was the case before reading it; I'm pretty sure legitimate psychic powers being discovered would warrant more than a HN article.
827.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
There's immediately a pop-up in a lightbox that you can't click out of besides clicking the little "x"... no thanks. Intrusive ads suck .
828.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
It's obviously anecdotal and not a rigourous breakdown. I have no experience with React but what little experience I have with Angular makes me think I would come to the same biased conclusion... Angular was just a massive pain to work
829.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
All I'm saying is that a luxury watch doesn't bring anything fundamentally new to the table. There's no reason anyone would look at the Rolex on your wrist and be jealous of anything other than the status it implies. It'
830.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
1. Prestige = status symbol. OK. We get it. 2. Quality... Well, my phone is my watch. Moot point. I'm not buying and discarding $20 Timex's every year. Not to mention this says you could keep the watch and your children could inhe
831.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
>A watch is a watch is a watch. Unless you have a Rolex. In which case you have a rather fancy watch, but a watch nonetheless.
832.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
To add to unethical_ben's point: Similarly a gargantuan mansion only compels you to fill it with furnishings, it doesn't directly improve your quality of life... maybe it's just me personally but as long as I have enough sp
833.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
The article addressed both of your points. The people in charge of "testing" the device before approving the purchase were probably getting kickbacks. The prosecution opted to go for fraud over corporate manslaughter because the f
834.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I'm familiar with the tracking image "trick" but I assumed most email clients wouldn't load those by default. The other comments seem to indicate I was wrong. :(
835.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Is there any reliable way to do this? Most mail clients will block receipt-type stuff by default...
836.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I'd rather see his expression if he ever found himself face to face with someone his false testimony put away for a couple decades... the majority of the prime of someone's life gone in a flash because of such incompetence... it&#
837.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
I won't pretend to understand the exact business model, but it sounds like this is an entirely different can of worms. Unless there is a lot more clarification, I don't see why this is an issue, though. The few people I know who h
838.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
So what? It's not about subsidizing smaller artists; it's about not forcing artists to unilaterally eat Apple Music's loss-leading costs.
839.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
"Damage" being a ton of publicity and PR about their new streaming service? I wish I could be so "damaged".
840.
▲
by
mfoy_
11y ago
Isn't that apples to oranges? I would think it goes like this: I want to have pictures taken of me during a performance. But I cannot take pictures of myself while performing. So I pay a photographer to take those pictures for me. They
More ›