Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
meowface
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
631.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Came across this interesting thread in /r/golang. No one managed to provide a satisfying answer in the thread.
632.
▲
"Why is my execution 3x faster with a `log.Printf()`?"
(old.reddit.com)
1 points
by
meowface
3y ago
|
1 comments
633.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Agreed, but I think they raise a fair point that some kind of automated testing probably should've existed to look for sudden major changes in prompt -> output production between versions, with lots of prompt test cases. Maybe this
634.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
StrictYAML provides a subset of YAML without the annoying footguns: https://hitchdev.com/strictyaml/features-removed/
635.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
I think a more likely scenario is that people will be so used to it that a lot of people are going to have trouble believing that real things are real. Conspiracy theorists already suffer from this and it's going to get so much worse.
636.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
That's very different.
637.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
And somehow the more advanced one is still on 1.0 (for now) and the less advanced one is on 1.5.
638.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
That just made my head spin even more. (Like, I get it, but it's just a very tortuous naming system.) The free version is called Pro, Gemini Advanced is actually Gemini Ultra, the less powerful version upgraded to the more powerful mod
639.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
>Moving off github is a good idea anyway, since they took away source code search for non-signed-in-users. I experience that annoyance every time I need to find the source of an error string in someone's github project. It could be
640.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Centralization is just too convenient for most people. Most people - technical or otherwise - won't accept the slightest quality-of-life (edit: and network size/activity) hit in exchange for the greater robustness of decentralized
641.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Ah, yeah, you're right.
642.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
This is really cool.
643.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
>If you manage to pwn a key, you have access to traffic. That's why I mentioned "Full (Strict)" SSL. If you configure this in Cloudflare then the entire user <-> Cloudflare <-> origin path is encrypted and atta
644.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
>Getting in at the "ground floor" of a new datacentre build is pretty much the ultimate exploit. I can just imagine the attackers licking their lips when they first breached the data center. Good reminder to use "Full (Str
645.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Do we have decent reason to believe this is no longer the case for US citizens and the NSA, post-Snowden?
646.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
For these kinds of attacks it's nearly always China, Russia, US, or sometimes Iran. 95% chance it's either China or Russia, here.
647.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Is anyone actively working on new models that take these (and the issue raised in the link) into account?
648.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
I just enable all of uBlock's cosmetic and "annoyances" lists. It seems to block them all.
649.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
ripgrep, grab, ugrep, hypergrep... Any of the four are probably fast enough for any of my use cases but I suddenly feel tempted to micro-optimize and spend ages comparing them all.
650.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
This is not a complaint about the phone but, God, visiting that website is a nightmare. Immediately hit with a sudden sound notification, a chat widget, a popup, and random decorations scattered all over the screen. https://i.img
651.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
It doesn't refuse. See this comment containing examples from the complaint: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38782668
652.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
It would be helpful if comments like this could somehow be pinned to the top of the thread, since a lot of the thread contains speculation over this point.
653.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
My understanding is they have one of the most corrupt and unjust legal systems of the developed countries.
654.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
I suspect they will crack down on that within the next few years.
655.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
Yes, but for such a significant contribution to a huge project it's good etiquette to squash on your own before submitting the PR. (Not that it means the PR shouldn't be reviewed and accepted.) Honestly, I frequently do this for m
656.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
To what degree would a non-spinning, non-moving black hole necessarily produce even very weak gravitational waves? Would some be produced as matter/energy reaches it? If so, would no gravitational waves at all be produced if nothing wa
657.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
A lot of the article is about how the New York Times was too negatively obsessed with Trump. The author definitely doesn't like Trump, but a big focus is on the anti-Trump bias.
658.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
They did apologize for that: https://www.nytco.com/company/prizes-awards/new-york-times-s... It's still completely inexcusable, but I think they understand how wrong it was.
659.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
The article they finally ended up publishing on him was quite terrible, too. Doxing stuff aside, I actually wasn't expecting the article to be as bad as it was.
660.
▲
by
meowface
3y ago
I guessed it was them but only because they're the only 3 I know off-hand.
More ›