menzoic

10 ms·

91.
by menzoic 3y ago
You don't need to use a device. You can use a User-Agent header to make it look like a real device and use a proxy with an IP that a normal user would use
92.
by menzoic 3y ago
This reminds me of the flash sites
93.
by menzoic 4y ago
Pretty good quote!
94.
by menzoic 4y ago
Its not about making money, its about opening up the tech to the public (including source, weights...etc)
95.
by menzoic 4y ago
Vicuna: An Open-Source Chatbot Impressing GPT-4 with 90%* ChatGPT Quality by the Team with members from UC Berkeley, CMU, Stanford, and UC San Diego https://vicuna.lmsys.org/
96.
by menzoic 4y ago
"Public" data sources aren't in conflict with GDPR
97.
by menzoic 4y ago
Its not like banning you from getting high in Amsterdam. In that situation both you and the drugs are in amsterdam where they have no jurisdiction.
98.
by menzoic 4y ago
Capped at 20 million euros
99.
by menzoic 4y ago
Complete ignorance, byzantine fault tolerance is a great addition to society. No need to rely on intermediaries for trusted communication. This is not limited to financial transactions. Clear benefits to society are: oppression resistant vo
100.
by menzoic 4y ago
thats because they couldn't keep up due to the disruption of the supply chain. No corporation avoids money
101.
by menzoic 4y ago
Why is that relevant? Anyone can create crap. That doesn't change the tech.
102.
by menzoic 4y ago
> I'd wager both fields have had roughly the same human capital afforded to them Highly unlikely. AI received massive government funding. Digital cash not so much. There are thousands of labs studying AI, not so with digital cash.
103.
by menzoic 4y ago
Anyone with a few hundred bucks to spare can do it by renting GPUs from a cloud provider. It only cost Stanford $600 to create Alpaca from LLAMA. $100 to generate instructions with GPT-3 and $500 to rent cloud GPUs. The license restriction
104.
by menzoic 4y ago
Stanford only spent $500 to fine-tune LLAMA for humam instruction with 52k instructions generated by GPT-3. This probably costs less. The use of GPT to generate the instruction data instead of humans is the massive cost reduction. The actua
105.
by menzoic 4y ago
Why would they?
106.
by menzoic 4y ago
That sounds more like a hindsight thing. In most systems authorization doesn't happen at the storage layer. Most queries fetch data by an identifier which is only assumed to be valid based on authorization that typically happens at the
107.
by menzoic 4y ago
It seems you're doing the opposite of "missing the forest for the trees". You see the forest (the app) but you're not seeing the individual trees. The answer to why companies don't have one interface with GPT is tha
108.
by menzoic 4y ago
ChatGPT provides excellent explanations in multiple languages for all code I've seen it write.
109.
by menzoic 4y ago
Using cryptography you can be sure the person you're talking to at least own the account they're using to talk to you.
110.
by menzoic 4y ago
This wouldn't work because there's no way to enforce that all AI generated content gets stored in a single place.
111.
by menzoic 4y ago
wheres the leaderboard at?
112.
by menzoic 4y ago
Times like this are great opportunities for growth. This can help you build consistent habits in the future to have more durable storage practices.
113.
by menzoic 4y ago
>NOTE: the vendor's position is that the password database is not intended to be secure against an attacker who has that level of access to the local PC. Such a trash response from a provider of software thats supposed to protect se
114.
by menzoic 4y ago
> The bigger problem is that in the USA healthcare is tied to employment. That's messed up True but COBRA coverage lets you pay to stay on your job-based health insurance (cheaper) for a limited time after your job ends (usually 18
115.
by menzoic 4y ago
Try "turn the car blue"
116.
by menzoic 4y ago
That doesn't mean you need to suffer. Reality is harsh. Cutting out toxicity is required.
117.
by menzoic 4y ago
> A blockchain does not magically solve security issues. This is a weird statement. Blockchain security is real and it isn't "magic". Blockchain is specifically designed to secure decentralized applications. > In fact,
118.
by menzoic 4y ago
Software is always used to build something. A digital advertising company does in fact have software as the core business. You need software engineering managers to manage the software that continues to be built and get more complex.
119.
by menzoic 4y ago
> who would ever buy a neural lace from a startup — or even an established company like Google who might just lose interest I'm sure they would if it helped relieve severe chronic pain. A limited period of relief is still better tha
120.
by menzoic 4y ago
The software you mentioned were pioneers in their category. On the other hand, VSCode had the benefit of learning from the many IDES in the saturated market that came before it. If VSCode was one of the first IDE it would not look anywhere

More ›