mens_rea

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mens_rea 9mo ago

   Deeply flawed paper for several reasons: * Small data set of 2 runs (!!) * Exaggerated claims (saying A1 beat 50% of testers, yet only 4/10 testers found LESS vulns than A1, and A1 had a nearly 50% false positive rate) * AI agents were
2. 2.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   There were also more loaves of bread sold than window machines in 2012Q3. Oh, sorry, I thought we were just comparing unrelated things to 'prove' Microsoft is in trouble...
3. 3.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   I don't imagine he tossed in digitizer as a requirement just for the giggles.
4. 4.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   Nope. No Digitizer. Thanks for playing.
5. 5.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
6. 6.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   I love that this title is so unbiased and doesn't at all blow the document out of proportion or make it appear more sinister than it actually is. Thank you for not misleading readers with your title in order to get views and points.
7. 7.▲
   by mens_rea 14y ago

   Exactly the points I wanted to make. The article is vague at best and no statistical evidence is presented anywhere.