menaerus

19 ms·

391.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Known result from where? I failed to see the reference where it was proven before. Maybe I missed it. Do you have a reference?
392.
by menaerus 11mo ago
One of the math academics on that thread says the following: > My point is that basic ideas reappear at many places; humans often fail to realize that they apply in a different setting, while a machine doesn't have this problem! I r
393.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Yeah, ok, but this doesn't invalidate what I said above. Completing the degree with MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, and such will cost you ~$100k per year (give or take) but they will also open you a door of landing a prestigious job more eas
394.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Mixed mode is about the same function compiled with different evaluation semantics in different TUs, and it is legit. The only case they are wondering about is how deal with inlined functions and they suggest ABI extensions to support it du
395.
by menaerus 11mo ago
People who can afford themselves going to private schools have a reason why they prefer spending 100ks vs less. Prestige schools gets you a prestige job so "It is almost unimaginable that attending a private college could have a positi
396.
by menaerus 11mo ago
This seems to be 2nd in row proof from the same author by using the AI models. First time it was the ChatGPT which wrote the formal Lean proof for Erdos Problem #340. https://arxiv.org/html/2510.19804v1#Thmtheorem3 &gt
397.
by menaerus 11mo ago
The funny thing is that it works, have a look at the MR. It says: All existing tests pass. Additional DWARF tests verify: DWARF structure (DW_TAG_compile_unit, DW_TAG_subprogram). Breakpoints by function and line in both GDB and LL
398.
by menaerus 11mo ago
I tried to give a counter-example of people being replaced in an extremely complex piece of software as we speak. This may or may not be related to AI but I am inclined to think that there is some correlation - yesterday 8 people in the tea
399.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Nobody here is talking about the pacemakers nor am I suggesting that AI will be replacing 100% of working force. While we are at writing documentation, did you hear about the latest layoffs from MySQL which, among others, impacted heavily t
400.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Do you understand that no code besides the header copyright was copied? So what copyright exactly are you talking about?
401.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Too flawed? Did you miss that tiny detail that MR fixes a long time issue for ocaml? This is exactly political because there's no legal or technical issue. Only fluff by scared developers. I have no stakes in this but I'm sincerel
402.
by menaerus 11mo ago
So there's no point? Sloppy maybe yes but technically incorrect or legally questionable no. Struggle is real
403.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Yes, please then find those for now imaginative issues and drill through them? Sorry, but I haven't seen anyone in that MR calling out for technical deficiencies so this is just crying out loud in a public for no concrete reasons. It&#
404.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Social maybe yes what legal aspects? Everybody keeps repeating that but there is no copyright infringement. Maybe you can point me to one? I understand that people are uncomfortable with this, I am likely too, but objectively looking there&
405.
by menaerus 11mo ago
No code besides the header was copied so I am asking what is so problematic about it?
406.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Yes what? Both oxcaml and ocaml have compatible LGPL licenses so I didn't get your argument. But even if that hadn't been the case, what exactly would be the problem? Are you saying that I cannot learn from a copyrighted book writ
407.
by menaerus 11mo ago
It matters because it completely weakens their point of stance and make them look unreasonable. Header is irrelevant since it isn't copyright infringement, and FWIW when it has been corrected (in the MR), then they decided that the MR
408.
by menaerus 11mo ago
> Do you mind showing me some examples of that? That seems so implausible to me What's so special about it that I need to show you the example?
409.
by menaerus 11mo ago
I believe it was random forest that we combined with EKF.
410.
by menaerus 11mo ago
> LLMs tend to include subtle mistakes or even completely incorrect information (and reasoning!) which disrupts this process. You see, so many humans do that as well but yet we make it believe that LLMs are somehow special here. Yes, the
411.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Incidentally, I worked on the exact same thing - Kalman filtering for tracking objects in hard real-time systems. And it is not quite as simple as one would think - developing mathematical models for all kinds of different objects that one
412.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Right right, I get it. Pharma, structural engineering, discrete manufacturing, ..., all of the industries which are "too hard" to be conquered by some stupid statistical parrot. You're being delusional my friend but I am not
413.
by menaerus 11mo ago
I am wondering how often do you use AI models? Because I do it on a daily basis, and as much as they have limitations, I find them to be performing incredibly well. It's far very far from being a demo - last time it was a demo that loo
414.
by menaerus 11mo ago
Can you give an example what exactly was copied? I ask because I took a look into MR and original repo, and the conclusion is that the tool only copy-pasted the copyright header but not the code. So I am still wondering - what's wrong
415.
by menaerus 11mo ago
I see. Let's take another example here, I hope I understood you - imagine you have an AI model which is connected to all of your company's in-house data generation sources such as wiki, chat, jira, emails, merge requests, excel sh
416.
by menaerus 11mo ago
I thought the OCR was one of the obvious examples where we have a classical technology that is already working very well but in the long-run I don't see it surviving. _Generic_ AI models already can do the OCR kinda good but they are n
417.
by menaerus 11mo ago
With all due respect, all of those examples are the examples of "yesterday" ... that's how we have been bringing money to businesses for decades, no? Today we have AI models that can already do as good, almost as good, or eve
418.
by menaerus 11mo ago
> There are boring, well-behaved classical solutions for many of the use-cases where fancy ML is pushed today. I know some examples but not too many. Care to share more examples?
419.
by menaerus 11mo ago
A bank - HSBC. Read the article.
420.
by menaerus 11mo ago
If not ad-hominum, what is it then? I mean, you did not provide any substantiated reason why would their research be false but you went straight to pin-point their experience, or lack thereof. FWIW I find this research to align on my though

More ›