3 ms·
Too flawed? Did you miss that tiny detail that MR fixes a long time issue for ocaml? This is exactly political because there's no legal or technical issue. Only
by menaerus 11mo ago
Too flawed? Did you miss that tiny detail that MR fixes a long time issue for ocaml? This is exactly political because there's no legal or technical issue. Only fluff by scared developers. I have no stakes in this but I'm sincerely surprised by the amount of unreasonable and unsubstantiated claims and explanations given in this thread and MR
- zeratax 11mo agoI don't get why you do not understand why nobody wants to waste time on a MR where the author didn't even themselves have any interest on looking over it even once. https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/14369/files#diff-bc37d034bad564583790a46f19d807abfe519c5671395fd494d8cce506c42947 https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/14369/files#diff-bc37d03... also all the unused functions... did it fix a long time issue? maybe, but 9 tests for 13k lines doesnt give much confidence in that and even if it worked perfectly, who will maintain this?