memexy

9 ms·

31.
by memexy 6y ago
It's good to know I re-invented a concept that had been in politics for over a decade. Independent discoveries are always fun. I was just making observations but it's good to know what I observed is called dog whistling. So that&#
32.
Urban Planet: Ecology, Community, and Growth Through the Next Century(longnow.org)
2 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
33.
by memexy 6y ago
Which part of my statement about being trained in the human psyche was incorrect? Also, I didn't ask about your credentials and they're irrelevant to whatever point you're trying to make. I have a graduate degree in math. Hav
34.
The Sound of Silence (2017)(foundersatwork.posthaven.com)
1 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
35.
by memexy 6y ago
So then you weren't asking the question in good faith. When I asked you to clarify you dodged the question. I wouldn't ask if I knew, I asked because I didn't know what you were referring to. If you want me to talk to you the
36.
Common Knowledge (Logic)(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
37.
List of Semantic Reasoners(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
38.
Foundations of Description Logic [pdf](aifb.kit.edu)
2 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
39.
Course on Description Logic(inf.unibz.it)
2 points by memexy 6y ago|0 comments
40.
by memexy 6y ago
Ok. That's a reasonable answer and I recommend assuming good faith next time and not trolling.
41.
by memexy 6y ago
> "I don't know what HBD is, care to explain?" > Yup, pretty much. How do you propose I respond to your answer? I asked for clarification and you replied with a troll response. How would you respond if I did the same?
42.
by memexy 6y ago
I don't know what HBD is, care to explain?
43.
by memexy 6y ago
> As for unfalsifiable, you claim there are dog whistles in every second sentence SA writes, and dog whistles are, by definition, unfalsifiable. You can claim anyone can see it if they look critically enough because if someone suggests t
44.
by memexy 6y ago
I don't know what critical theory is and what it is used for. I use basic reasoning and back up what I say. I used the word critical as in "critical thinking" (unrelated to any actual academic theory of criticality). It'
45.
by memexy 6y ago
Don't apologize. Stop using such tactics. I already pointed out what you did, how you did it, and why it was disingenuous. If you were sincere you would not have quoted me out of context, you would not have tried to bias the group opin
46.
by memexy 6y ago
Yes, thanks for pointing it out. Both types of professionals receive training in understanding the human psyche so my point remains unchanged > A psychiatrist is a physician who specializes in psychiatry, the branch of medicine devoted t
47.
by memexy 6y ago
Which one. Quote it and send it on keybase and I will address it when I have time. You can then copy and paste it wherever you want with cryptographic proof that I said it.
48.
by memexy 6y ago
> The only reason why you'd want me to respond via email is so that your responses wouldn't be public for other people to see. If you want a longer format, I'm willing to break this whole conversation down step by step. I
49.
by memexy 6y ago
Thanks for the kind words. I stopped using reddit some time ago but good to know there are still good people there like you working to uphold standards. I am on keybase and I'm always happy to chat with fellow reasoners: keybase.io&#x2
50.
by memexy 6y ago
What's funny about his use of the word?
51.
by memexy 6y ago
Are you done mis-characterizating everything I say? If not, please quote everything else I've said and characterize them however you want so I can point to actual examples of how you willfully keep mis-interpreting whatever I'm sa
52.
by memexy 6y ago
It's incumbent upon whoever is confused to ask clarifying questions instead of making insinuations about the inadequacy of the person making the argument. If you were confused then you should have asked clarifying questions instead of
53.
by memexy 6y ago
Even more reason to stand up for what's right. And I appreciate your encouragement. I want more people to act in good faith so I try to model the type of argument I want to see more of through actual actions.
54.
by memexy 6y ago
> Harassment covers a wide range of behaviors of an offensive nature. It is commonly understood as behavior that demeans, humiliates or embarrasses a person, and it is characteristically identified by its unlikelihood in terms of social
55.
by memexy 6y ago
> But this is irrelevant. Calling someone a sociopath regardless of whether or not you have evidence isn't harassment. You realize that harassment is a crime, right? It's honestly quite astounding that you believe restrictions
56.
by memexy 6y ago
I agree with you. His actions paint a very dark picture and I also don't understand why people are defending him. It's like you said, he's either smart enough to know what he's doing, in which case his actions should be
57.
by memexy 6y ago
What point are you making? That my definition of voluntary is incorrect? If so then I disagree because I use the word exactly how I mean it. No one put a knife to anyone's throat and forced them to do anything that they could have avoi
58.
by memexy 6y ago
In case it wasn't clear I will spell it out. That choice was not what was being contended. It was your behavior of bad faith actions that I was contending. You tried to bias the actual argument and paint me in a certain way by quoting
59.
by memexy 6y ago
> Your suggestion that Scott instead write, "I'm making this decision of my own volition but I personally plan to work out a peaceful solution for all parties involved" is not a rephrasing. It's a completely different
60.
by memexy 6y ago
Is criticism no longer allowed? Isn't that the foundation of rational debate? I have no opinions on his anonymity. I personally don't care or want to know who he is and wasn't planning on reading the NYT article. I have my ow

More ›