meira

38 ms·

301.
by meira 10y ago
I like these "You're not especial" kind of article. Don't looks like satire to me. Or you do what you are good for or you are a pretender (you can also work hard toward it :))
302.
by meira 10y ago
> Simply casting typically male roles (comedic lead, scientist, etc.) with female actors is feminist. No, it is not. Print roles as male only that is mysogenic. Comedic lead and scientists are only typically male roles because they are -
303.
by meira 10y ago
The thing is that we have been in the work of parody for so long time that we don't ever know were it started. Get the Rocky series blockbuster, for example. We had a much better history, with a black man and boxe. But then someone sto
304.
by meira 10y ago
Show me people that are directly helped by these "philantropists" and I'll tell you if I think they are doing "charity" or not. Charity like internet.org is scam.
305.
by meira 10y ago
This is not charity, is a VC fund for what he wants, and we barely know what he wants. He is not a philantropist, but a wannabe Gates or Zuckerberg (that aren't either, just billionares spending billions).
306.
by meira 10y ago
Great article. My experience as a software engineer in Brazil is very similar.
307.
by meira 10y ago
> At the very least, the fact we can even have this conversation is a testament to the (possibly degrading) freedom of speech that we are lucky to have in the US and one that seems to be waning now in Philippines specifically. I'm s
308.
by meira 10y ago
I don't think it was that right. It's very fictional with one or other existing tool or proccess.
309.
by meira 10y ago
> As many others have pointed out, the difference is you have BLM here and Atlantic articles that point out drone strikes publishing in the US, and there is some movement (although, not as rapid as many of us would wish for) on the groun
310.
by meira 10y ago
Both are part of the regime, but people that support them do it because they don't feel included in the political system.
311.
by meira 10y ago
Yep. After all, the political problems of the ones you cited all goes back to the American regime.
312.
by meira 10y ago
People supporting Trump (right wing), people supporting Bernie Sanders (left wing) and BLM (both) don't agree with this. But yeah, you have a great piece of America's population that got a lot from this world-wide regime.
313.
by meira 10y ago
So You're agreeing with me that this is bullshit and US is not a democracy? After all, Obama was elected to halt Wars and we are on the brink of WWIII. You vote but don't get what you elect. Now, if we add big money to the sum, I
314.
by meira 10y ago
Let's get to some definitions here. Is a country democratic if it has local elections and at the same time segreggate their own and drone other nations - while removing democratically elected presidents ?
315.
by meira 10y ago
Austrália and US are a great example of democracy and miscegenation. Bad lucky to the "rhodesian people", they didn't killed enough natives to win the land and Institute "democracy".
316.
by meira 10y ago
Can we start the counter of americans that do nothing against the killings of black people or americans/europeans that don't care about their government killing hundreds of thousands and displacing millions? Moral relativism.
317.
by meira 10y ago
Cars and motorbikes are two different things but they can be compared as means to get from one place to another. It isn't very hard to use the same analogy with angular x React concerning the development of web interfaces.
318.
by meira 10y ago
Well, this is exactly what the brexiters asked for. Good Jobs becoming available to them.
319.
Release: React Native 0.29(github.com)
1 points by meira 10y ago|0 comments
320.
by meira 10y ago
I agree with you. The worst part is that most of the links in front page are from these big média players that have paywalls and adblockers blockers. A strange shift in HN profile.
321.
by meira 10y ago
> You might not have realized, but when you say that WeChat is better for China (because it creates jobs and whatnot), you are exactly claiming that protectionist policies are good for the country. Of course is this I'm saying our f
322.
by meira 10y ago
Hahaha. Man! Read your stuff again, and read what I said. Try to find a way to conciliate both. It is impossible! You even put things that didn't show up there, here, like $4.50. Why you took it so personal? Stop writing all these nons
323.
by meira 10y ago
Man, you're completely insane, and I'm going to answer you for the last time only to keep at least a minimum of coherence in this "discussion" if someone reads it in the future. > First, let's stop with the name-
324.
by meira 10y ago
With this attitude, I think you are crazy in any discussion. What you are asking is proof that Shenzhen and Beijing are better for China than Silicon Valley, and this is stupidity. You're not insane, you're dumb as hell, just like
325.
by meira 10y ago
Man, you're nuts.
326.
by meira 10y ago
> That is a false equivalence (the kind of damage to Freedom is not the same), and still does not show how WeChat benefits "most if not all" Chinese. Even if you reduce to the pure economic argument, you would still have to sho
327.
by meira 10y ago
rglullis, you have to calm down yourself and decide in which thread we are talking. Don't mix things up :)
328.
by meira 10y ago
> Please drop the conspiracionist tone if you want a serious conversation, or at the very least drop this silly attempt at sweeping very important arguments under the rug just to make your point. These "simple" things like Free
329.
by meira 10y ago
> I'll try to ignore your ad-hominen. I have lived through a bunch of the history you are claiming I don't know anything about. Why do you believe that your alleged personal experience is a good economy theory? Let's f
330.
by meira 10y ago
For you and for a lot of people, rglullis. This is the mainstream West media thinking. But I missed your arguments proving that WeChat could be worse to China than is FB to Brazil.

More ›