meinte37

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by meinte37 5y ago

   The article is “addressed to those who did not want to build a compiler”: what's the point of this article then? It seems to implore to not build compilers, but those who did not want to in the first place, probably actually did not bu
2. 2.▲
   by meinte37 9y ago

   Happy to oblige, even if LWBs are meant to make things less complicated ;)
3. 3.▲
   by meinte37 9y ago

   I have some (paywall) trouble accessing the article you reference, so I cannot really comment, but to me that seems to be describing an IDE, not necessarily a LWB that produces an IDE for a (set of) DSL(s).
4. 4.▲
   by meinte37 9y ago

   Since Racket participated in the Language Workbench Challenge 2016, the answer is a resounding YES :)