meds2010

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by meds2010 8y ago

   some would call sugar a scandal, probably with valid reasoning too: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sugar-harvard-scandal-nutriti... And they both clearly involve outright deception. The difference is probably just not
2. 2.▲
   by meds2010 8y ago

   It depends on how innocent you think Nestle is. I can understand why someone would conclude that there is some "messing with the truthfulness" going on at Nestle. Both in the product design, and the marketing. It's why a lot
3. 3.▲
   by meds2010 8y ago

   I can see a product designer make the case that if millions are dying, then the product is defective in some way. The rules are different in two different places, but I can see how someone thinks these two cases are similar, both are about
4. 4.▲
   by meds2010 8y ago

   the numbers are definitely worse. "millions" dead? that sounds pretty bad. Not sure how true that is. It certainly isn't clear. But the idea that a western corporation will do something like changing a product to save money,
5. 5.▲
   by meds2010 8y ago

   like any drug deal, you should test the product. not exactly a cultural difference here. this whole thing even sounds like dallas buyers club.