mda

52 ms·

631.
by mda 8y ago
Sure, but by far the biggest contributor to the project is Google and it should take some credit for it.
632.
by mda 8y ago
Did you read the article? Most of your points are already refuted there.
633.
by mda 8y ago
Getting killed under cannon fire in their own barracks, not a nice end for an order which served for so many years. The destructon of bektashi order was also a decision with long reaching consequences. Still, what most people believes that
634.
by mda 8y ago
Stealing from people? huh?
635.
by mda 8y ago
Apparently they only use this data for simple question and answer queries, because they do not disclose breakdown of query types i can not certainly know the numbers, and i made an optimistic guess. Also i don't think my points regardi
636.
by mda 8y ago
Sure, I don't want to use bing behind a proxy, a lot of people here is acting as if it is something else. They are acting as if it is something else. You like it? Use it.
637.
by mda 8y ago
My guess, <1%. I would be happy to be refuted with real data. Creating and maintaining a global scale high quality search engine requires a huge team with billion dollar level resources. They have neither, for now.
638.
by mda 8y ago
Any breakdown of which source is used for which percentage of queries? No.
639.
by mda 8y ago
Sure, but in my eyes this makes them a proxy, not a search engine.It is nice to have alternatives, but it looks at the moment they are at the mercy of Bing. Maybe one day they will evolve and become an actual search engine. who knows.
640.
by mda 8y ago
Yet still it is Bing search + Bing ads.
641.
by mda 8y ago
Mostly Bing for any non trivial query. As far as I see, they never give actual numbers / breakdown and try hard to divert attention from this. If they do i would love to know.
642.
by mda 8y ago
DDG = Bing for most of the queries in US. You are basically using bing and 95% of the time and happy with it. Good I guess.
643.
by mda 8y ago
DDG = Bing anyways.
644.
by mda 8y ago
Or.. DDG is just a tool in a bigger war in the background. It feels like it can exist only because its benefactors allow it to exist.
645.
by mda 8y ago
How much do you think DDG will pay apple for this?
646.
by mda 8y ago
Because duckduckgo = bing (for non trivial queries)
647.
by mda 8y ago
Bing is the biggest source, they try hard to divert from this fact.
648.
by mda 8y ago
I'm not sure what you mean by "ML features", but AMD/ATI's dismissive attitude towards the ML and GPU-compute communities is looking quite silly by now. I disagree, ML computing has tons of competition and its mar
649.
by mda 8y ago
They don't have the resources to "fix" it, they tested it and decided it was not stable enough. What they did was right. Firefox entirely disables GPU acceleration, so I am not sure what your argument is.
650.
by mda 8y ago
It is admirable that they took on this job, but I would probably stay away from it for serious things because of security aspect. Modern browsers (Chrome - Firefox) are probably a much safer choice.
651.
by mda 8y ago
If they limit their hardware choices (like Apple) it is actually not -that- difficult.
652.
by mda 8y ago
As if every aspect of our life is not shaped by "big corp"s. It is laughable actually. They should vandalize their tv, detergent box and cereals as well.
653.
by mda 8y ago
Here is the stackoverflow trend chart Fwiw. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=flutter%2Crea... My limited experience with Flutter made a very good first impression.
654.
by mda 8y ago
Did you really emulate all the conditions published in the page? I seriously doubt it. Otherwise all your claims are speculation and moot.
655.
by mda 8y ago
I watched almost all the games with commentaries, I agree with the commentators, the style is definitely unique and not seen before. If the engine could see these they would not get absolutely destroyed.
656.
by mda 8y ago
You are the one making this claim: "You can still run the games past the exact commit of Stockfish they used and it finds blunders in its own play, so it still feels like there's a lack of transparency." This claim implies f
657.
by mda 8y ago
Still, zero proof of foul play. But sure i would very much enjoy watching Alphazero destroy Stockfish in a public match.
658.
by mda 8y ago
Like which move? I wonder why stockfish developers do not claim any of this?
659.
by mda 8y ago
So if Alpha zero trashes Stockfish 10 will you be saying, Oh Stockfish 11 sees these as only positions.. Please.
660.
by mda 8y ago
I am sorry, but you just seem to be trying to find truth by reading many different lies, this in my experience, almost never works. Still, good luck.

More ›