mcdougall

5 ms·

1.
by mcdougall 13y ago
This is going to be hard to test, as I don't have the hardware, but I'll look it up. Thanks!
2.
by mcdougall 13y ago
What happens to it on a retina display?
3.
by mcdougall 13y ago
I never claimed to be minimalist in size, only in features. Most of the stuff that gets installed is to support python extensions.
4.
by mcdougall 13y ago
> Does it have categories/labels? No. > Priorities? Yes. > There absolutely needs to be a features list on the homepage. Will do.
5.
by mcdougall 13y ago
I'll be adding a list of features on the website soon.
6.
by mcdougall 13y ago
> It doesn't seem to work in OS X 10.8, it starts then closes immediately. I'm opening a bug report for this. I didn't check 10.8 yet. > Also the choice of wxWIdgets for a new app is quite unfortunate, I think Qt is gen
7.
by mcdougall 13y ago
> The UI on OSX is not pretty but decent. At least it's native instead of GTK. I'm not a osx user, although I understand the desire to have pretty and consistent user interfaces. My problem is that I'm limited by what wxWi
8.
by mcdougall 13y ago
baretorrent is not "small", it's simple. Most of its size comes from wxWidgets and python, which are there for the extensions. Linking statically to all the libraries and ditching python could probably reduce the size by an o
9.
by mcdougall 13y ago
I'm the baretorrent developer. > it appears to be c++ (which is fine) It also supports python extensions. > but also entirely without tests? Or did I miss something? You did not, but I'm up to a point where this is becoming
10.
by mcdougall 13y ago
I'm the baretorrent developer. > This is an interesting space to watch. Over the years, we've seen the cycle happen half a dozen times This is not specific to torrent clients. Feature-creep is common. Since this was posted to H