maybesomaybenot

4 ms·

1.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
I think a lot of these people object to AI probably see the gross amounts of energy it is using, or the trillions of dollars going to fewer than half a dozen men (most american, mostly white). But, once you've had AI help you solve som
2.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
"knowing about technology" ... filter out the javascript programmers and that leaves about 15% of HN.
3.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Thanks for telling me how wrong I am! I bet you're fun at parties.
4.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Like I made very clear, it is great at some things and terrible at others. YMMV. /shrugs/
5.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
You can also test your professor's answers. I don't just walk around going "Oh, Claude was right", I'm literally using what I just learned and am generating correct results. I'm not learning facts like dates, o
6.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Simple: one thing I'm learning about is RFCs for TCP/IP. I can literally go test it. It's like saying, "How do you know it is right when it says 2+2=4"? Some knowledge when taught is self-correcting. Other things I&
7.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Creating new knowledge from current knowledge is called "synthesis" (ancient term, nothing modern). I'm hoping you're right, it would be amazing.
8.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
You assume automation solves the problem. If it did, Facebook wouldn't be hiring close to 100,000 humans to inspect content.
9.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Claude is like having my own college professor. I've learned more in the past month with Claude then I learned in the past year. I can ask questions repeatedly and get clarification as fine as a need it. Granted, Claude has limits, but
10.
by maybesomaybenot 2y ago
Um, no. I don't want to see pics of NSFL gore before the userbase has had a chance to remove them. Which is what most moderators spend time removing from FB, to the point where it psychologically traumatizes them.