maxst

11 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   > Any live websites using it? Even google isn't using it on thier websites. That says a lot.
2. 92.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   I believe there is a niche for simple animations: just a sequence of frames in a loop. No need for JavaScript, since it's just a simple loop. Easy to upload to image hosting services. And all browsers already support such simple-loop animat
3. 93.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   I remember you guys wanted to create simplified MNG 2.0, without stuff like MAGN and delta-PNG. What happened to it?
4. 94.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   No need to fork libpng. Currently, vanilla libpng and apng patch are both hosted on sourceforge, and it's trivial to automatically download both and apply the patch. In fact, a few distros (Arch, Gentoo, Mandriva, FreeBSD) already do exactl
5. 95.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   It look like Mozilla is considering JPEG XR support: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX/2012-November-26
6. 96.▲
   by maxst 14y ago

   What if you simply create APNG using this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/apngasm/ And then convert APNG to GIF using this: http://sourceforge.net/projects/apng2gif/ It would be interesting to compare the results...