matz1

29 ms·

241.
by matz1 6y ago
Probably why government around the world like lockdown so much.
242.
by matz1 6y ago
Yes I will expect that most people will not do that but some people will. People are so diverse, I can't assume everybody behave the same, let alone behave the way I want.
243.
by matz1 6y ago
For democracy to work, the vote must be considered valid by all party. One party think the vote is not valid thus of course its expected for them to try to fight it.
244.
by matz1 6y ago
> More and more automation could get us there The only thing that can work is if technology/automation is advance enough that everybody can live happily without depending on other people at all. That even 'other people' ca
245.
by matz1 6y ago
>I'm not expecting you to pull up a tour-bus full of tourists, move into it and use it as housing, or a sex den for turning tricks But you should expecting that, you can't assume the listener will self-moderate.
246.
by matz1 6y ago
Then build your own or at least support other who are willing to be different. Not saying its going to be easy. You want something to happen you have to keep fight/work for it.
247.
by matz1 6y ago
This should be viewed as opportunity of disruption by the competitor. So You can’t get an Uber to that location? Don't worry use our service instead
248.
by matz1 6y ago
I'm fine if Airbnb doesn't want the business, its private company after all. I'm more disappointed that no other company try to take the opportunity.
249.
by matz1 6y ago
Like anything else, the more you do it the easier it gets. Its not going to be instant but you'll get used to it.
250.
by matz1 6y ago
How easy is it to find out the cycle threshold the provider use?
251.
by matz1 6y ago
>The metrics they use for exercising editorial control do not matter for this line of logic. Sure it may not matter to you but it matter to other people including me. How they publish it mater (at least to me). I would support one but no
252.
by matz1 6y ago
>Facebook employee decides what posts to show you Here FB manually decide what constitute 'good' or 'bad' content. For example: fb employee decide trump content is 'bad' thus not allowing it. >Facebook e
253.
by matz1 6y ago
Maybe or maybe not but nonetheless something need to be done to fix this silencing issue.
254.
by matz1 6y ago
Maybe not broken up but the point is something need to be done to reduce the power of these company. They are simply too powerful. Maybe some policy to make it easy for some new company/startup to disturb/compete ?
255.
by matz1 6y ago
yes but is the algorithms include : spread only bad content ? I doubt so, the algorithms may be : spread content that increase engagement, without making explicit judgement whether the content is 'good' or 'bad'.
256.
by matz1 6y ago
>Facebook recommend users to join groups, follow pages, and even shows content that is not from people you follow. So it isn't just a telephone company that allows you to make phone calls, it's a service that makes an editorial
257.
by matz1 6y ago
Not every body agree with that, a lot of people prefer private business should be able to chose their customers and decline business for any reason.
258.
by matz1 6y ago
If that true then they kind a deserve it, when the majority didn't use their number as strength to do something but it then they deserve to lose.
259.
by matz1 6y ago
I certainly hope we can see some disruptor come out from this. People been saying google/fb/apple is too big to compete, to me this seem like golden opportunity.
260.
by matz1 6y ago
What interesting is how all these company act in the same way, why don't some company/platform took the opportunity to act the opposite to differentiate themselves ? I believe there is still large enough market for people who oppo
261.
by matz1 6y ago
>You have the world's largest megaphone. You bring tens of thousands of hardline supporters to the Capitol on the day that officially seals the transfer of power. You and your henchmen spend hours forcefully lying and claiming that
262.
by matz1 6y ago
Because they have the power. When you have power you get to decide the rule.
263.
by matz1 6y ago
As long as that way, whatever it is, still involve more than one human, you can't avoid the subjectivity problem. Its not technology problem. Its human problem.
264.
by matz1 6y ago
This should be an opportunity for competing company to differentiate themself by offering to support parler.
265.
by matz1 6y ago
It is always subjective, the entity in power get to decide the rule, in this case google is the entity in power. Its not enough to have rule that says 'illegal content not allowed', in the case of play store it has to be 'ill
266.
by matz1 6y ago
Sure there will be ISP or registrars that wouldn't support them but there could be other ISP or other registrars to support them. There's plenty of ways to re-platform.
267.
by matz1 6y ago
This is how it works since forever, either build your own or take over control to force it to change.
268.
by matz1 6y ago
Yup went to florida recenty, mainly because they have less restriction, glad there is still state that has not gone insane.
269.
by matz1 6y ago
>political philosophy that built the modern world Can you explain this and how that contradict my statement >You should feel right at home living under the Chinese communist party? I don't feel right at home about it but it doesn
270.
by matz1 6y ago
>If you don’t get covid, you don’t die of covid Likewise If you get covid, doesn't mean you will die from covid. vast majority of people will be fine. >If you lockdown, you don’t get covid. It’s a simplification but it’s a start

More ›