Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
matz1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
631.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
How is it bad ? The 125117 number is including people were admitted to hospital for other than covid but happen to test positive for covid.
632.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Trade safety? How? The latest cdc estimate of ifr is only 0.65%, how is that going to destroy the economy?
633.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Racking up death? The cdc latest estimatate the ifr to be only 0.65%.
634.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I'll be honest, I want other people to contribute while I enjoy it for free.
635.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Yes but many new cases doesn't mean its bad. Most of it are either asymptomatic or having mild symptoms.
636.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I don't want to get covid either but the risk is low enough that it doesn't bother me at all. I try to live my life as it was before pandemic as much as i can.
637.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>Because if it's just "want", that's not people interested in living in a society Agree, people who don't want to wear mask certainly not interested in living in a society where they are forced to wear it against
638.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Right, society eventually get to decide, which society is it? The winner get to decide. Both side are part of the society. Both side fight for their interest. The against mask side will fight for its interest, just like the pro mask people
639.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>It is not just for them to decide that So you get to decide it for them ? >It is in their This is the issue, you assume its their interest.
640.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Then Its for them to decide that. They may very well knew and accept the what you called "deleterious" effect.
641.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Good enough reason is subjective, if someone says they don't like mask because its uncomfortable, its obviously significant enough reason for them.
642.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>Especially when it's really not that big of an imposition This is my biggest issue, dismissing it as something trivial. Everybody is different, for some people it can be huge inconvenience.
643.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>The older I am the more I'm convinced that development is not individual thing - it's a team sport I don't know, maybe development should be individual thing. Less bureaucracy, less politics, you get to control more. Besi
644.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
If that is what interest you and you think its beneficial to you than yes you should do it. Other people who is not interested in it won't do it.
645.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Like most people who get infected, its very unlikely he is going to die from this, he'll recover and move on.
646.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
you can't expect 0% death, its unrealistic.
647.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
You can balance it out by not being so sterilized in your own home, that something you can control.
648.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>If we let the virus run wild then over a million Americans would die from it If we use ifr 1% then there would be 3 million american which is not bad. > And the hospitals would be vastly overwhelmed Only small percentage of hospital
649.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
You can't rely on "they should just know better" otherwise you would face a lot of disappointment. If you want something you better have the teeth or something to force the change.
650.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
The policy should be treat mask as recommendation not mandate and no business occupancy restriction. >and the virus has exploded Yes the virus has exploded but not worth going into lockdown, most people are asymptomatic or have mild symp
651.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Its subjective. The side who has more power get to define the meaning of hate speech.
652.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
>I know that I wouldn't work for them from Europe if those were the conditions. There is no system that would satisfy everyone. You wouldn't work for them but pretty sure many other people wouldn't find it a burden. In thi
653.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Company should be able to fire people at any reason any time, nothing wrong with that.
654.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
law is not absolute, nothing wrong with challenging the law if you think its unjust.
655.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
I'm not rich enough to own tesla car so I buy tesla stock instead.
656.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Its not a mistake, as a worker you are not obligated to come to work if you don't want to, likewise Tesla is also not obligated to pay you for not working.
657.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Who said anything about sacrificing the weak?
658.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
ok then how many are positive but free or minimal of harm caused by the virus ?
659.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Not a problem in the sense that, tested positive doesn't mean you are sick, tested positive doesn't mean you are having severe symptom.
660.
▲
by
matz1
6y ago
Its to avoid economic shutdown. Its to protect people from economic disaster.
More ›