matz1

9 ms·

31.
by matz1 5y ago
Why would I afraid of hanging out in close proximity with unvaccinated individual if I'm vaccinated ?
32.
by matz1 5y ago
How is not wanting to be vaccinated is idiot ? Vaccination should be personal preference.
33.
by matz1 5y ago
Own preference (whatever that is) is always more important than other preference. If you don't think your own preference is important then don't complain when other dictate the outcome.
34.
by matz1 5y ago
I'm not but many people will interact with people wearing mask differently (knowingly or unknowingly). Besides, the staff hate the mask but they have to wear because of the policy. It also contribute to shortage of worker: its already
35.
by matz1 5y ago
Well, the picture in article showing the staff with mask and face shield!. In texas sadly most of the restaurant wait staff still wear mask.
36.
by matz1 5y ago
The Mask policy exacerbate it. It dehumanize person when you can't see their face.
37.
by matz1 5y ago
yes assume its just a part of name.
38.
by matz1 5y ago
It shouldn't matter if they called beta forever or whatever. As consumer you should never believe what the company promise anyway. I would evaluate it myself or refer to trusted third party reviewer based on what it can actually do rig
39.
by matz1 5y ago
>I am not sure if there is a better solution just because you are not sure doesn't mean there is no solution or doesn't mean no body else can't find the solution >You will either get cops going in without fully assessin
40.
by matz1 5y ago
>The police have a solution. Then the solution is not good enough, they should figure out a better way. >People don't seem to like it since they go in without fully assessing the situation. bottom line what the general public wan
41.
by matz1 5y ago
>Lets take a situation where someone reports something like a shootout inside a house. What would you have the cops do in that situation? How do they handle it in other countries? >If this is a real event, they don't go in quickl
42.
by matz1 5y ago
Unfortunately, its consequences of people allowed to have guns.
43.
by matz1 5y ago
yes of course it will require significant retrofit. The benefit seems significant compared to the cost for the company: to attract employee to want to work in the office.
44.
by matz1 5y ago
faang companies has huge campus which probably mostly empty right now, why don't they built housing inside their own campus ? This will greatly attract their employee to work in the office.
45.
by matz1 5y ago
Tax won't necessarily be an issue, the total net cost of my housing can still be cheaper than if I pay it myself. >And if they fire you you'll have to deal with two of the top ten most stressful life experiences at once Of cour
46.
by matz1 5y ago
Why don't the faang companies do it then with their own campus? This will attract large number of employee to go back to office.
47.
by matz1 5y ago
Doesn't have to be sharing bathroom. It can have private bathroom & private kitchen just like regular apartment/studio.
48.
by matz1 5y ago
Heres and idea: Want me to go back to office ? Convert some of the space into housing/apartment/living space. Rent it to employee for free/cheap as benefit. Not only I'll go back to office, I'll live in the office.
49.
by matz1 5y ago
If that true then just sue them, anybody can sue anyone for any reason.
50.
by matz1 5y ago
Its called marketing, companies exaggerate claim all the time. As consumer, one should not believe in company marketing claim/promise or they'll be in trouble.
51.
by matz1 5y ago
Its a choice, at least for me there is a lot of thing in life that a lot more worrying than 2/10000 risk of preventable death
52.
by matz1 5y ago
>The IFR (Infected Fatality Rate4) for the original variant was about 0.01% for those in their 20s and 0.2% for those in their 40 Thanks, so 2x of that is 0.02% and 0.4%, that was my point: 2x of a low rate is still low
53.
by matz1 5y ago
The author mentioned the risk is 2x higher but what is the risk of the original variant itself ? The author didn't mention that.
54.
by matz1 5y ago
>It looks like the risk of death is 2x higher for Delta than for the original variant: 2x of what ? 2x of low risk is still a low risk.
55.
by matz1 5y ago
Human kills already, and yet certainly do not want human to be banned for driving. I too expect and accept that some accident caused by driverless car that kills kid/animal (that human wouldn't do) will happen (if not already happ
56.
by matz1 5y ago
Well see, I personally accept and support far from perfect no driver at wheel car. I doubt I'm a minority.
57.
by matz1 5y ago
To get to the so called "no driver at the wheel" driving you have to go through what you called "driver assist" stage, its a continuous improvement. So are you saying people accept it in the far from perfect driver stage
58.
by matz1 5y ago
Disagree, Tesla approach is the right approach. You want to test the technology as early as possible in real situation as much as possible.
59.
by matz1 5y ago
>They MUST be perfect for the general public to accept them No they don't, its far from perfect right now yet its available and you can use it right now provided you have money to buy it.
60.
by matz1 5y ago
>Mandatory breathalyzer tests before every engine start We don't do that today and we are still allowing people to drive on the road today.

More ›