mattomata

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   Nope, it was over email. I can point you at the various fixes for things I've reported since this first became available, but given your skepticism I'm sure it would not help since he seems to exclusively use the changeset descrip
2. 2.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   When I have reached out to ncopa to report issues in their feed he responded: > the secdb has so far been an experiment, but seems like people are actually using it, so I should set up some proper automated testing. I doubt there is a be
3. 3.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   Alpine is built around musl libc, which has numerous compatibility differences from a traditional glibc: http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/Functional_differences_from_g... Some folks solve this by adding glibc to Alpine (
4. 4.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   Yeah, that's exactly why we chose to start from debs.
5. 5.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   Right, "nothing else" = "FROM scratch". In the talk, I call this "FROM scratch -- for the rest of us." That a half-truth because this also tries to set up a minimal compatible environment for common cases, e.g.
6. 6.▲
   by mattomata 9y ago

   The video explains why. The goal isn't small, it's minimal. By pursuing small at the expense of compatibility we got things like musl libc (which has tons of compat issues). If all we wanted was small we could have started from m