Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
mattkrause
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
mattkrause
9mo ago
What's the minimum residency you'd accept, because 3-4 years seems quite long to me.
62.
▲
by
mattkrause
9mo ago
The link is essentially a press release. The information you want is (sorta) in the actual paper it describes *. "The images were analyzed using a commercially available AI-CAD system (Lunit INSIGHT MMG, version 1.1.7.0; Lunit Inc.), d
63.
▲
by
mattkrause
9mo ago
Speech can certainly be an action. "I'm running now" doesn't make you jog if you're sitting down, but it certainly kicks off a campaign if you were considering elected office. JL Austin called these sort of statemen
64.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
That depends immensely on the type of effect you're looking for. Within-subject effects (this happens when one does A, but not when doing B) can be fine with small sample sizes, especially if you can repeat variations on A and B many
65.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
"generally valid" is a bit of a loaded phrase. They are indeed coupled, but the coupling is complicated and may be situationally dependent. Honestly, it's hard to imagine many aggregate measurements that aren't. For exam
66.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
I read that paper as suggesting that development, behavior, and fMRI are all hard. It's not at all clear to me that teenagers' brains OR behaviours should be stable across years , especially when it involves decision-making or em
67.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
fMRI ususally measures BOLD, changes in blood oxygenation (well, deoxygenation). The point of the paper is that you can get relative changes like that in lots of ways: you could have more or less blood, or take out more/less oxygen f
68.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
I'll co-sign SubiculumCode's comment -- there's a lot of yelling about how bad fMRI is generally, which is not particularly fair to the fMRI research (or at least the better parts of it) or related to the argument. The BOLD s
69.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
We certainly had questions like that as part of bigger assessments and they were pretty reasonable. However, some of the teachers at my school also had short pop-quizzes meant to ensure that everyone kept up with the reading. These were usu
70.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
I like the idea—I hate freezing up while retrieving something I “know—-but the app itself seems a bit thin. I got to level thirteen having seen only four verbs (aller, faire, être, and parler) and mostly in the present.
71.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
Those quizzes are part of the problem. It was so dispiriting to read, even enjoy, the assignment and then get dinged because you couldn’t remember whether the protagonist put on an otherwise irrelevant blue sweater or red jacket.
72.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
I do find it useful in discussions of LLMs themselves. (Gemini did this; Claude did it too but it used to get tripped up like that). I do wish people wouldn’t do it when it doesn’t add to the conversation but I would advocate for collective
73.
▲
by
mattkrause
10mo ago
I don’t want flaky, in-my-face AI on my phone. I find a lot of the low-key things helpful: I use an app at the same time and place every day, and it’s nice to have a handy one-tap way to open it. It does a decent job organizing photos and
74.
▲
by
mattkrause
11mo ago
Exactly. If some dogs chew up an important component, the CERN dog-catcher won't avoid responsibility just by saying "Well, the computer said there weren't any dogs inside the fence, so I believed it." Instead, they shou
75.
▲
by
mattkrause
11mo ago
You can beat the wrap but you can’t beat the rye.
76.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
This is surprisingly common at big research universities! My classmate even managed to take a course on glassblowing--and have it count for her PhD!
77.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
Keeps robots out but lets vampires in?
78.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
Yup—too much potassium. Apparently you can (almost) do it unintentionally if you play tennis in the heat—though 88oz (2.6L) seems like a lot! Here’s a case report: Hakimian, J., Goldbarg, S. H., Park, C. H., & Kerwin, T. C. (2014). Deat
79.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
For context, many (most?) other EHRs are too, though they call it M now so it sounds less disease-ridden.
80.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
There are other animal models, some of which even seem to develop dementia-like symptoms spontaneously. Mice have absolutely dominated research because they're relatively cheap, lots of powerful genetic tools are available, and the PR
81.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
You can do PET imaging for it--there are a bunch of 18F-based tracers that work reasonably well. It also inversely correlates with Abeta levels in the CSF. Ne Neither of those are particularly easy procedures, but certainly better than a
82.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
(N+1)th time's the charm! I do sincerely hope that we find something for Azheimer's, but there's just a mountain of data suggesting that mouse models of Alzheimer's and/or ABeta simply not that useful.
83.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
I'm sure status is part of it but I think it's almost certainly driven by "availability." Big names give more talks in more places and people follow their outputs specifically (e.g., author-based alerts on PubMed or Goog
84.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
Yes! After I finished grad school (electrophysiology and imaging in large animal models, so seemingly relevant experience), I thought about becoming a clinician. However, I wasn't even eligible to apply to med school because it had bee
85.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
The zebra quote is probably paraphrased from Theodore Woodward, who won a NObel prize (though not for that!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Woodward
86.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
> That feels underwhelming That could be the motto of basically every EHR system!
87.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
The company doesn't exactly have a fiduciary duty to you . It (or more specifically, its agents) have one to the company itself. This can be broken in cases of fraud, illegality, or conflict of interest. For example, in Caremark and
88.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
The timeline (short vs. long ) doesn't matter at all. The current shareholders have chosen the management (e.g., by voting for the Board) and are consequently agreeing to follow their plan. If you don't like that plan, you have
89.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
Yes! Dodge v. Ford is a tough one because Ford explicitly announced that he was using the company's money to advance his own philanthropic aim. That's essentially theft: it's the company's money, not his. However, as
90.
▲
by
mattkrause
1y ago
It's a bit circular if the scientist's field (and prize) are for contributions to AI.
More ›