mattebb

3 ms·

1.
by mattebb 13y ago
Side note: Crohn's doesn't really have anything to do with gluten. Some people claim a GF diet helps them, but the disease itself is different to Celiac, and there's not much hard evidence to show that a GF diet helps in any
2.
by mattebb 13y ago
500px also mechanically crops your images to square in the main listing, completely changing your compositions. This is a deal breaker for me.
3.
by mattebb 13y ago
There is a component of that, but it's also dangerous to dismiss any negative feedback that way too. Pro user since ~2005 here. I don't mind change in general, but I think the change they made here is definitely for the worse. Art needs spa
4.
by mattebb 14y ago
Edit, messed up frame rate calc, it's not 1/72s, it's 1/64s: 48/(270/360)=64
5.
by mattebb 14y ago
I'd like to get to the point where frame rate is a creative choice and not a technical limitation. Perhaps some kinds of films/scenes/shots are better suited to different frame rates, for the impression and feeling they impart on the viewer
6.
by mattebb 14y ago
> How does better temporal resolution (higher frame rate) enable better spacial resolution (see makeup detail)? In no or low motion, there can be no difference. Because you're not watching a single still frame - it's more like your brai
7.
by mattebb 14y ago
There was no motion blur conversion, the 24fps version was made by taking every second frame. The film was shot at 48fps with a 270 degree shutter angle, which is equivalent to a shutter speed of 1/72s. This was done to balance the look of