matricks

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by matricks 7mo ago

   > can’t really move beyond their training data I don’t even think humans can “move beyond” their sensory data. They generalize using it, which is amazing, but they are still limited by it.* So why is this a reasonable standard for non-bi
2. 2.▲
   by matricks 7mo ago

   It depends. SoTA models are at least very close to AGI when it comes to textual and still image inputs for most domains. In many domains, SoTA AI is superhuman both in time and speed. (Not wrt energy efficiency.*) AI SoTA for video is not a
3. 3.▲
   by matricks 7mo ago

   > There's precious little training material left that isn't generated by LLMs themselves. Percentage-wise this is quite exaggerated. > Consider this to be model collapse (i.e. we might be at the best SOTA possible with the a
4. 4.▲
   by matricks 4y ago

   Calling such a concept a 'layer' is quite confusing, given my experience with Photoshop, OmniGraffle, Pixelmator, and most other drawing tools I've seen. Why not just call it an "element" or "shape" or &qu
5. 5.▲
   by matricks 4y ago

   First, you are not alone. Seek out support of all kinds. Don't blame "yourself" ... remember that the very idea of "self" is always changing and only a small part of it is under short term conscious control. Mental