Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
matchbok
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Something called hard work?
32.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
How dare those people build a business and create jobs! They must have no humanity. Geez.
33.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
The real workers? So the execs that literally run the company and give people the jobs are... what exactly?
34.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Please take 30 seconds and imagine a world with 0% apartment vacancy and get back to us. lol.
35.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
I agree. The discoverability of gestures is tough and something that nobody has really cracked yet.
36.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
You can swipe left/right on the very bottom of the screen to switch "back" to apps. The back swipe gesture is for "in app" navigation and is much better than what Android has. The Android back button can do like a m
37.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Back can mean multiple things? That's a good thing? Sheesh. The Android back button as been broken for years.
38.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
...They obviously would do it in a way that doesn't do that? Do you think this company can outsmart them in the long-run?
39.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
I give it a week, tops. The next iOS update at the latest.
40.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Literally no business works likes this. Every team and hire is a risk, and the market understands this. You don't have the information to say if there was "waste" and even if there was, so what?
41.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
One alternative is never hiring them in the first place, which is a real possibility if some bad ideas like yours were put into law.
42.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Well, the US has the best companies and most innovative tech for a reason. Spotify is an outlier - Europe just doesn't compare.
43.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
That's.... not how things work. (Maybe on DSA Twitter, but not in the real world lol)
44.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Or Spotify could have not taken the risk a couple years ago and never hired them. Which is what would have happened in your scenario. (No dynamism) Businesses take risks. Part of that includes hiring people for things that may not work ou
45.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Funny that this website has the ever-annoying scroll indicator. Why don't web designers understand we already have a scroll indicator? It's called the scroll bar. There is literally no function for these things.
46.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
You only like it now because salaries haven't adjusted to the fact that the pool of candidates who can do you job goes up considerably if you are full-time remote. Long-term, wages will stagnate as opportunities in non-USA countries op
47.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Nobody knows. What will catch up soon is any country in the USA time zones discovering they can do you job for 20% pay. People who think they will be able to work remotely while making top-city salary are delusional.
48.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Annnnnnyways the leaders at top companies, included Zoom, seem to disagree. I guess you are smarter than them. :)
49.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
I love how it has to be some massive conspiracy, not the well-known fact that junior employees and productivity both take a hit with full-time remote work. A lot of these orgs are coasting and the impact won't be known for a while.
50.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Good, crypto needs to die. What a waste of resources.
51.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Please do just a bit of thinking about vacancy. The idea that anyone would purposely let a unit they own sit empty for 10 years is ridiculous, and doesn't happen. We need vacant units so people can move around. I guess in your perfect
52.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
That data is meaningless without context. Atlanta is also building way more homes than most areas.
53.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Corporate ownership of homes has been a reality for 100 years. It's a drop in the bucket.
54.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
And there's a reason your country probably has very few successful businesses.
55.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Does the employee have an obligation to the company to work forever? No.
56.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Lol you are a troll account. No other way. Thanks for the laugh!
57.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Do you actually think most police aren't chasing thieves because they have to go bust some drug dealers in order to steal their cash? Like, you really believe that? Please tell me you don't. This must be a joke. SF basically told
58.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Are you a troll account? I can't imagine someone being so obtuse, this must be a joke. You continue to paint any pushback as some bad faith, exaggerated caricature in order to support your silly ideas. The fact of the matter is most pe
59.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
You must live a sheltered life to think this. Viewing an entire group of people as evil or inherently bad. People like you are the reason why progress in the area is so hard. You don't understand the reality of the job.
60.
▲
by
matchbok
3y ago
Dude, nobody expects a random cop to spend a month trying to track down a $200 bicycle. That's not their job. Your views are extremely myopic. Low-income neighborhoods around me are asking for MORE police because of how things have got
More ›