matchbok3

7 ms·

91.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
If an employee of yours spent hours every day attacking you.... would you keep them employed? Why not?
92.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
I mean... yes? A company pays you to work. If you are using company resources, during company time, to attack your company... why exactly would they keep you employees? She was warned multiple times. It's quite amazing this court let t
93.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
I'd imagine this is more common than one would think, unfortunately. Has SF tried to determine how much "fresh food" is purchased through this program? What qualifies as "success" here?
94.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Love the downvotes :(
95.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Very interesting approach, however I wonder if the combination of Codex + Work in the same app makes sense? I could see a world where the technical needs of a developer are hampered by the overall superapp architecture. I guess we'll s
96.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Please keep comments productive and avoid personal attacks.
97.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Except in the many, many cases where layoffs help the company focus on a core product.
98.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Yeah, I agree. Also, there's little evidence that consumers really care about this. Batteries last a long time now.
99.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Didn't care? Consumers don't care about this. Like most EU laws, this is a solution in search of a problem. Nintendo, like every other tech company, did the research and found that people simply don't care about this stuff. N
100.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Also, you have no idea how I've voted. The fact that you make such assumptions is all the evidence that shows your arguments are about as strong as a wet cardboard box. What a way to convince people to join your party!
101.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
You are just literally wrong. Your side keeps yapping that line, but it's just entirely false outside of Bluesky and the Groups. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2026/07/01/polls/times-s...
102.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
The lack of a coherent border policy from 2020-2023 is.... right-wing propaganda? Were you alive during that time? I honestly can't tell if you are trolling or just dumb. The border was complete chaos and cost the dems the election. Yo
103.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
If you don't think companies realize this I suggest you talk to some leaders. It's a very obvious issue with any layoff and is why they are usually the last option.
104.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Freedom? What freedom is being lost, exactly?
105.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Also forgiving a loan that both parties signed willingly is dumb and solves nothing.
106.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
Weird project? They have many members of congress. Right wing money? How about common sense. Socialism has never, and will never, work.
107.
by matchbok3 3mo ago
In exactly 0 of my hiring decisions, ever, was legislation a reason why someone is paid.
108.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
I too was young and idealistic at one point. You should start that company and guarantee that you will never lay anyone off. Will you do it? Why not? Please don't make excuses. If it's easy, you should be able to!
109.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Places where rent control worked: 0. Every. Single. Time.
110.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
They should have predicted AI? lol.
111.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Would you rather they never hire those people? Because that is one option.
112.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Do you think those natural resources would have been taken advantage of as well in some other system? Same with the geography and isolation. You are talking about entirely different things. Makes no sense whatsoever. You could make your sam
113.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Being proud of selfish behavior is something that is embarrassing to see. What a great role model you are.
114.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Are you joking? Your huge SUV class kills more people than saves by easily 10x. What happens when you hit a car? Selfish behavior is ruining our streets.
115.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
This is a nonsensical piece. >You'll notice a trend here: Consent is just gone. It does not exist when AI enters the room in 90% of cases. Companies just foist it on you and tell you to shut up and like it, or leave. This is ... not
116.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
There are hundreds of phone models. A smartphone is a just one type. Apple came out of nowhere and invented the smartphone because the existing system was controlled by the telcos and horrible phone technology. The same thing can easily hap
117.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
We already have choice - people can buy many different types of phones. Nothing about this is about choice or the free market. They want special treatment. Apple is free to do what they want. The EU can go and try and build their own iPhone
118.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
We already have user choice - it's called buying an iPhone or not. Nobody is forced to buy an iPhone, or a smartphone at all. The EU is just a disaster with these laws. They can't innovate so they do this.
119.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Forcing choices is not "competition". We already have competition. People can buy any phone they want. They can use whatever AI they want. There's nothing "fair" about this at all. It's a group of luddites in t
120.
by matchbok3 4mo ago
Slaves? Get real kid. Obviously nothing is guaranteed. But family is family, and is worth having. You clearly are a angry, bitter person. Perhaps that is why you are alone.

More ›